|
jdlea 12-08-2006, 02:37 PM You know I thought about Fox - for a split second.
These five have been consistent all season long or made some game changing plays. Fox on the other hand, has sorta stood in for Vincent while injured. Not to take anything away from his contribution though.
The only thing I have against Fox is all of last week's game. He looked horrible. He consistently got torched by Crumpler, which I can excuse, but instead of trying to make a tackle on the first big completion, he tries to lay him out instead of going for the actual tackle...he's Alge Crumpler! Also, he fell down on the Norwood run when he could have at least slowed him. If he makes that play, who knows how that drive and the game go. I'm not blaming the loss on him, but he had a bad game last week. Not that that should be all he's judged on, but I don't think he's ready to start just yet.
ArtMonkDrillz 12-08-2006, 02:37 PM They never should have benched Brunell, not until ALL playoffs hope were lost..... Yes, I said it, and that's how I feel and I don't care if you guys don't like it!!
I guess dallas shouldn't have benched bledsoe until all their hopes for the playoffs were dashed... oh, wait...
celts32 12-08-2006, 02:40 PM So you haven't been please with Rock, Ladell and Frost?
Those guys have played pretty well but not well enough to excite me in the midst of a 4-8 season.
hesscl34 12-08-2006, 02:41 PM I guess dallas shouldn't have benched bledsoe until all their hopes for the playoffs were dashed... oh, wait...
We're not Dallas, and JC isn't Romo..... And Brunell isn't Bledsoe...
What's all this Dallas talk anyway? Bunch of cowgals on this site or what?
12thMan 12-08-2006, 02:43 PM Those guys have played pretty well but not well enough to excite me in the midst of a 4-8 season.
And that's all I'm really getting at, in the midst of a bad season...these guys have done a really good job - bright spots.
With Campbell it's more about what he represents than the actual numbers.
The Zimmermans 12-08-2006, 02:44 PM Sellers is having another great year in my opiion, god i hope we keep him around for a while
12thMan 12-08-2006, 02:46 PM We're not Dallas, and JC isn't Romo..... And Brunell isn't Bledsoe...
What's all this Dallas talk anyway? Bunch of cowgals on this site or what?
It's better that we tear Dallas up, instead of each other like we've been doing lately?
hesscl34 12-08-2006, 02:49 PM It's better that we tear Dallas up, instead of each other like we've been doing lately?
:bdh:
firstdown 12-08-2006, 03:05 PM I disagree. In my opinion, JC has been a bright spot. Obviously I was looking at more than simply statistics. I think his stats will come with time, by the way.
But it's become evident thus far his presence can change the dymanics of the offense and how we game plan some. He's made some throws already that we haven't seen in a while. If you want to look at his stats, sure we could nitpick all day long, but things like his poise, movement in the pocket and out of the pocket, his arm, down field vision are all positives. (see Jason Campbell thread by 12thMan).
In the end, I think he's definitely given this team a lot to look forward to next year.Yes he does have most of what you have said but his numbers do not say that he is this surprise. Romo has been a big surprise but I'm sorry Jason has not been. Your doing what you accused MB fans of so take off those JC glasses.
jdlea 12-08-2006, 03:07 PM We're not Dallas, and JC isn't Romo..... And Brunell isn't Bledsoe...
What's all this Dallas talk anyway? Bunch of cowgals on this site or what?
Yes, deflect everything by saying someone else isn't a fan. Don't contradict the vaild argument. The fact is no one knew what JC and Romo were, they did know they weren't winning with Brunell or Bledsoe. What was the problem with pulling them?
|