Fahrenheit 9/11

lol

"I won't be in anyone's movie but my own." - M. Moore

He's a pathetic PUD.

What goes around, comes around.

peace
mike
Yeah, and then they listed the 10 or so movies that he had been in that he didn't direct.

ALERT!!!!
Michael Moore's NUMBER 1 Supporter was on TV this morning!

http://www.nagshead.net/michaelmooresupporter.jpg

Bwhahaha!

Trudat boo!

hey all, I was told about a book they were talking about on cnn yesterday thats being released by the same publisher who released the encyclopedia sized bill clinton memoires. The new book being released is abouting killing President Bush and even how to do it. I think this is probably one of the most disgusting things I've ever heard about. I don't care if it's "political satire" as they r trying to say it is, because u know there r people in the extreme who will take what the book says to heart and might possibly try to do as the book says. I mean what the hell is wrong with our country when we are publishing books about why and how to kill individual people. This is just as bad as that assasin handbook that was in the news a few years ago except with one extremely high level target.

theres lots of idiots doing stupid shit, i'd be kinda surprised if a major publisher would print it, but i've heard of stranger things...

Don't forget the US mass grave newsweek reported where we ship "prisoner" (mostly locals that haven't done anything wrong) in airtight crates and there are always a few the suffocate each trip.

Also, there were plenty of connections between the Bush's and Osama in the mid 90's. And the US even trained and supplied Osama even earlier than that. As long as he's killing Russians, we're down with terrorists, right?

The reason he'd sue Michael Moore is this is a huge movie, if he could discredit it they would do it in a second.

Really? So after Russia tore down the wall, and took a step toward's democracy, the Bush's decieded to start funding Bin Laden, to start terrorising Russia, starting in the mid 90's? When Clinton was in office. Do you have any fact's to back this up?

Im with SFTT. I like to see all point's of view to make an educated decision, but having to put money into the pocket of a man who hates america, ain't gonna happen!

:biggthump :thumb: ALERT!!!!
Michael Moore's NUMBER 1 Supporter was on TV this morning!

http://www.nagshead.net/michaelmooresupporter.jpg

Bwhahaha!

Trudat boo!

I find it kinda funny how quickly we turned our attention away from Bin Laden and instead went after Saddam, despite the fact we have never found any weapons of mass destruction.

The truth is we'll never find Bin Laden, why? Because we're not trying to.

So where are these weapons that Saddam had anyway? Weren't they a huge reason we went in there in the first place? So now that we can't find them (because they didn't have any to start with) we instead hear the administration write it off with excuses, 'well, the world is a safer place now that Saddam is out'. Is it really though?? Anti-american sentiment is more heated than ever. The middle east is still a war zone, americans are still being killed, beheaded, etc. 911 was this administrations' perfect excuse to invade Iraq so baby bush could seek revenge for his daddy. He wanted to go in there before 911, so this was a convenient reason to justify it.

Bush is dragging the U.S. down the crapper. I really don't understand people that can stand by and support this buffoon.

Did anyone catch it when Bush totally butchered trying to pronounce 'Abu Ghraib'??

Just embarrassing, man. Totally embarrassing that this is the leader of the free world.

We are not safer with Sadam out of power? How do you no? What did we do to Bin Laden to force him to take down the WTC's? The fact is we have found chemical weapon's, although not in mass quantity, you don't think he shipped out his mobile weopon's development program's into neighboring countries? If he had nothing, why did he deny the inspector's access during the Clinton regime? If he had nothing to hide he could have maintained power over his country, so he gave it all up over nothing? He refused access because there was nothing there? The fact is we will alway's have enemies, we just eliminated one very dangerous one.

If you believe that Sadam having been left to himself, wouldn't develope some kind of WOMD to detonate on american soil, if givin the opportunity, your only fooling yourself.

The fact is, we were attacked 2 times under Clinton, once on our soil, and he didn't do a thing, and no sooner does he leave office we get hit with 9/11, it seem's doing nothing is more harmful to America, then meeting the enemy head on. At last check we haven't been attacked since 9/11, but Bush isn't getting the job done? I say no new's is good new's!

I sure hope Gibb's doesn't adhere to that kind of thinking during away games, we would't want to make the home crowd angry by beating them, would we?

btw, in case you don't know, there were no useable water trucks in Iraq after the invasion. Might not mean much to you, but saddam had russian generals as consultants, and they know that you can ship anything in a water truck, flush it out with jet fuel, and it'll pass american chemical sensors... and guess why the water trucks couldn't be used?

...they were contaminated with jet fuel.

http://www.davekopel.com/Terror/Fiftysix-Deceits-in-Fahrenheit-911.htm

Lengthy, but well documented, article on Michael Moore's slight of hand.

Whatever the facts, Moore's '9/11' should worry GOP

http://www.freep.com/news/politics/polcol6_20040706.htm