Is Scott Pioli available after the season?

Pages : [1] 2 3 4 5

Bill B
12-06-2006, 06:49 PM
I have not been able to find any information on the net other than Pioli's contract was set to expire after the 2006 draft.

Does anyone know if he signed a long term extension with the Patriots?

If not is there any way the Redskins can get him?

hesscl34
12-06-2006, 07:08 PM
Yep, just have Snyder write the check and he's ours... Not so sure that's a good thing...

Bill B
12-06-2006, 07:28 PM
Yep, just have Snyder write the check and he's ours... Not so sure that's a good thing...


You wouldn't take Pioli over the braintrust currently at Redskin Park?

One thing is for sure though is if Pioli or another proven GM came here - I would only want him if he was given assurance that Dan Synder would not be involved in any way in football personelle operations other than to sign his name on the dotted line when Pioli/the unnamed professional GM tells him.

How did Synder get all the money before buying the Redskins - he outbids himself for free agents like Archuletta!

SmootSmack
12-06-2006, 07:37 PM
I really don't think Gibbs would be so willing to cede control of picking players. It's what he wants to do

skinsfan69
12-06-2006, 09:24 PM
I think all this GM talk is premature. Things are going to stay the same around Ashburn until Gibbs leaves. He likes Vinny. And what Joe wants he gets.

MTK
12-06-2006, 09:29 PM
I wouldn't rule anything out with Gibbs. After all, he did give up control of the offense which is still pretty surprising when you think about it. If he thinks it would help, I'm sure he would consider it. That's the question though, does he see the current front office setup as a problem? Probably not.

skinsguy
12-06-2006, 09:34 PM
I wouldn't rule anything out with Gibbs. After all, he did give up control of the offense which is still pretty surprising when you think about it. If he thinks it would help, I'm sure he would consider it. That's the question though, does he see the current front office setup as a problem? Probably not.

And he's probably kicking himself for it! But, at least he can show people that although his offense wasn't great and too conservatives (as what I heard over and over again last year) at least he's proved that it can work and probably would've worked just fine again this year with our current talent.

SmootSmack
12-06-2006, 09:58 PM
I wouldn't rule anything out with Gibbs. After all, he did give up control of the offense which is still pretty surprising when you think about it. If he thinks it would help, I'm sure he would consider it. That's the question though, does he see the current front office setup as a problem? Probably not.

I think the difference though is this. Joe Gibbs has nothing to prove anymore as a coach. People know he can lead a team to greatness on the field. He's done it numerous times and has proven to be one of the best in history at that. So him ceding control of calling plays, yeah it's a big deal but then again it's not really. But the jury is still out (though most have already cast their ballots "No") on whether he can put together a great team, particularly one that someone else could lead down the road. Gibbs is a great, loyal man and all that but remember he's also a competitor. And I think the competitor in him wants to show that he can have the same success putting together a team as he does leading a team. I really don't see Gibbs going the way of Holmgren and saying "Ok, I'll just go back to coaching only."

Beemnseven
12-06-2006, 10:09 PM
Let's see...

Giving up a 3rd round draft choice for Mark Brunell who was going to be cut by Jacksonville anyway...

Giving up Champ Bailey AND a 2nd round choice for Clinton Portis...

Giving up a 3rd and 4th round draft choice, plus a $10 million bonus for Brandon Lloyd who won't come anywhere near his career averages for catches...

Giving Randle El a $10 million signing bonus when we already had 3 capable kick returners in Thrash, Betts, and Cartwright...

Giving up a 3rd round choice for T.J. Duckett who won't get more than 50 carries for the season...

Trading up in the '06 draft for Rocky McIntosh, losing next year's 2nd round choice when he can't even unseat Warrick Holdman or any other of the incompetent buffoons we have playing on defense...

Adam Archuleta -- do we need an explanation about him?

The defense is old, needs to be completely overhauled and gutted, and we haven't nearly enough draft picks next year to address a third of the needs on that side of the field.

If Joe Gibbs 'the GM' cannot see what sort of a wreck this team's personnel shape is in, then perhaps we have overestimated him.

paulskinsfan
12-06-2006, 10:28 PM
Let's see...

Giving up a 3rd round draft choice for Mark Brunell who was going to be cut by Jacksonville anyway...
Giving up Champ Bailey AND a 2nd round choice for Clinton Portis...
Giving up a 3rd and 4th round draft choice, plus a $10 million bonus for Brandon Lloyd who won't come anywhere near his career averages for catches...
Giving Randle El a $10 million signing bonus when we already had 3 capable kick returners in Thrash, Betts, and Cartwright...
Giving up a 3rd round choice for T.J. Duckett who won't get more than 50 carries for the season...
Trading up in the '06 draft for Rocky McIntosh, losing next year's 2nd round choice when he can't even unseat Warrick Holdman or any other of the incompetent buffoons we have playing on defense...
Adam Archuleta -- do we need an explanation about him?
The defense is old, needs to be completely overhauled and gutted, and we haven't nearly enough draft picks next year to address a third of the needs on that side of the field.
If Joe Gibbs 'the GM' cannot see what sort of a wreck this team's personnel shape is in, then perhaps we have overestimated him.



GREAT POST....duck and cover man, duck and cover.

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum