Im done....Gibbs must go.

Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43

12thMan
12-03-2006, 06:56 PM
negativity, now's there's somethin new. the redskins are my team and i still like gibbs .as far as the hall comment goes ?, that's ignorant.that's about as much time as i want to waste spioled brat tantrum.


No one here is saying they don't like the Redskins all of sudden and I honestly don't feel like anyone is being negative.

There is a diffence between being negative and telling the truth.

hesscl34
12-03-2006, 06:57 PM
I'm saying it causes inconsitency when you have two people trying to run one Offense. Gibbs knows how to run an offense, and from where I'm sitting all of that Saunders crap just causes confusion among staff and players. You end up chasing your tail when you don't stick with one kind of playing calling.

Redskin
12-03-2006, 06:57 PM
Ok but what are you done with?

JWsleep
12-03-2006, 06:57 PM
Do you realize, and I'm not trying to insult you here, that Gibbs, after this year, has two years left.

So now let's ask ourselves this: If we get more of the same, when do we clean house in two years or now?

Of course I realize that. The answer is obvious from my post--in two years. The big thing to remember here is it's Saunders first year, and this was Campbell's third start. And cleaning house has been Snyder's MO. HOw's that worked out?

charlielyons
12-03-2006, 06:58 PM
Hess, what is Joe Gibbs football? And so, Gibbs is responsible for the first quarter, and Al Saunders for the remaining three?

Are you sure that's what you're trying to say?
as long as joe gibbs makes our personell decisions we will continue to make bone head off season moves ..... i would be surprised if we trade our 1st rounder this year for another aging qb....

12thMan
12-03-2006, 06:58 PM
I'm saying it causes inconsitency when you have two people trying to run one Offense. Gibbs knows how to run an offense, and from where I'm sitting all of that Saunders crap just causes confusion among staff and players. You end up chasing your tail when you don't stick with one kind of playing calling.


But Hess two things: 1. Gibbs bought Saunders here. 2. If he wanted things to be different, then Joe Gibbs needs to change it, not Al.

12thMan
12-03-2006, 06:59 PM
Of course I realize that. The answer is obvious from my post--in two years. The big thing to remember here is it's Saunders first year, and this was Campbell's third start. And cleaning house has been Snyder's MO. HOw's that worked out?

How has bringing Gibbs back worked out so far?

hesscl34
12-03-2006, 07:00 PM
SNYDER brought Saunders here, and Gibbs allowed it and wanted it to HELP the team. Hind sight... 20/20. It was a mistake, too many chiefs. Get rid of him.

12thMan
12-03-2006, 07:02 PM
SNYDER brought Saunders here, and Gibbs allowed it and wanted it to HELP the team. Hind sight... 20/20. It was a mistake, too many chiefs. Get rid of him.

No, no, no....Saunders was all Gibbs idea sweetheart...all Danny did was sign the check. I don't think Al Saunders even crossed Danny's mind.

pg86
12-03-2006, 07:03 PM
Ok all you gibbs haters.....Lets bring back spurrier and yeah thats my sarcasm speaking!

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum