SmootSmack
12-04-2006, 09:33 AM
This is another quick fix idea, I thought our fans had gotten wise to this way of thinking.
I'll say this in the nicest way possible. Two of out every three fans here are senseless morons for at least 48 hours after a loss. Trade this guy, cut this guy, fire this guy. After a win, it's only one out of every three. The other one is nowhere to be found 'cause he doesn't know what to say when he can't complain.
skinsfan69
12-04-2006, 11:35 AM
I'll say this in the nicest way possible. Two of out every three fans here are senseless morons for at least 48 hours after a loss. Trade this guy, cut this guy, fire this guy. After a win, it's only one out of every three. The other one is nowhere to be found 'cause he doesn't know what to say when he can't complain.
So let me ask you something. How in the hell are we going to get better with no draft picks? One first day pick next year. There is no depth anywhere to be found on the roster. There are holes everywhere. I assume you think bringing in more free agents is the way to go.
SmootSmack
12-04-2006, 11:43 AM
So let me ask you something. How in the hell are we going to get better with no draft picks? One first day pick next year. There is no depth anywhere to be found on the roster. There are holes everywhere. I assume you think bringing in more free agents is the way to go.
I think depth is a league-wide issue. That's why the Eagles were burned by injuries last year, the Giants this year.
We're going to have to make the most of what picks we have, and maybe we'll look to pick up additional picks as well.
They key again will be free agency and re-signing the key guys that we have such as Dockery.
I think Gibbs and company will have learned a lesson after last season's free agent haul and will be much more careful this year.
The Zimmermans
12-04-2006, 12:07 PM
I think depth is a league-wide issue. That's why the Eagles were burned by injuries last year, the Giants this year.
Depth is not a league-wide issue, it's a team to team issue depending on their past drafts. Eagles draft many players, but so many of them suck.......giants draft decisions are also questionable. However, Baltimore, San Diego, and Chicago build consistent defenses through the draft by creating depth at every position
61cad
12-04-2006, 12:12 PM
So trading one of the best rb's in the league for a bunch of picks that may or may not be busts is the answer?
Kind of reminds of what Dallas did in the 80's.
SmootSmack
12-04-2006, 12:19 PM
We're going to have to make the most of what picks we have, and maybe we'll look to pick up additional picks as well.
They key again will be free agency and re-signing the key guys that we have such as Dockery.
I think Gibbs and company will have learned a lesson after last season's free agent haul and will be much more careful this year.
Apart from Archuleta, I really don't think we did bad in free agency. But you know me, I'm just a yes man
Arch was a costly mistake that we will pay for this offseason.
I think he's as good as gone, we'll bite his bullet.
The Zimmermans
12-04-2006, 12:34 PM
what did we truly expect outta ARCH with the amount of money we paid for him? absolutely rediculous. He wasn't a proven successful player, that defense in St. Louis has one decent year, and they won the superbowl, all downhill from there.
gabe1984
12-04-2006, 12:49 PM
so i guess he was the one with 1500 rec yards and 23 passing tds.... and he returned the fumbles into the endzone and plays def.
do you seriously think we would of had 1500rec yards and 23 passing TDs without portis making defenses respect our running attack?