How Is Our Playcalling?

Pages : 1 2 [3] 4

firstdown
12-05-2006, 07:40 PM
you have to remember, that for the past two years, we could win games like that...get a lead, let the D and running game take over. Its hard to switch gears this late in the season when nothing is going your way. I'm not saying what happened was justified though, but perhaps if the D returns to form, it won't matter so much. Someone suggested blaming the D line, and I didn't see much of the second half...but what I did see is Wright/Rumph getting burned a lot, and giving way too big of cushions
It was last year we won games like that not the year before we were 6/10 in 2004.

skinsguy
12-06-2006, 01:18 PM
Actually skinsguy no one was complaining about being too conservative, and no one said anything about campbell needing to throw more in the game.

Actually soccercycbk, yes they have been complaining about the offense being too conservative, especially this last game. If you have been here as long as I have, you would know where I am coming from with this, but you'd rather go on attack mode instead of trying to look at things from other's point of view.

Don't call me out again.

The Zimmermans
12-06-2006, 03:17 PM
I can't remember the last game we lost with a 150+ rusher and 100+ receiver. That campbell turnover made the difference, I blame that on AL for calling 10 straight playactions, getting campbell in trouble.

AlvinWalton'sNeckBrace
12-06-2006, 03:20 PM
It was last year we won games like that not the year before we were 6/10 in 2004.


My mistake, I remember our record in 2004...unfortunatly

12thMan
12-06-2006, 03:22 PM
I can't remember the last game we lost with a 150+ rusher and 100+ receiver. That campbell turnover made the difference, I blame that on AL for calling 10 straight playactions, getting campbell in trouble.


That is a pretty bizzare stat, isn't it? To have both a rusher and a passer go over 100 Yds and still lose.

Anyway, minus the interception I thought Campbell played okay - not great, but he didn't stink it up either.

soccercycbk
12-06-2006, 10:36 PM
Actually soccercycbk, yes they have been complaining about the offense being too conservative, especially this last game. If you have been here as long as I have, you would know where I am coming from with this, but you'd rather go on attack mode instead of trying to look at things from other's point of view.

Don't call me out again.
i'm sorry, i was under the impression that when you reply to a thread your response is related to the topic. I didn't know that you post your frustrations with Warpath in random threads.

SmootSmack
12-06-2006, 10:50 PM
Ok, let's not make it personal here

Hey soccer, do us a favor and drop "fucking" from your sig. Thank you

JGisLordOfTheRings
12-06-2006, 11:16 PM
I can't remember the last game we lost with a 150+ rusher and 100+ receiver. That campbell turnover made the difference, I blame that on AL for calling 10 straight playactions, getting campbell in trouble.


Excellent point! You run to set up play action and every time we did it, the RB had a big hole up the middle. The run to PA ratio should be like 3:1 respectively. Stop trying to outsmart yourself AL!!!

mike340
12-06-2006, 11:24 PM
Was anyone else surprised when the Skins accepted the penalty with Atlanta on the 7 on second down? Instead of 3rd down at the 7 it was 2nd down at the 17. The scenarios for the following play run as follows:
Atl gains up to 6 yards: a FG vs. 3rd and goal from between the 11 and the ~20
Atl gains 7-9 yards: a TD vs. 3rd and goal from about the 9
Atl gains 10+ yards: a TD vs. 3rd and goal within the 7 or a TD (what actually happened)
I thought by taking the penalty we actually opened up their passing game, if they had tried to rush they wouldn't have netted the necessary yardage since everyone was near the goal line.
Did anyone else have that reaction during the game (or after)?

skinsguy
12-07-2006, 12:09 AM
i'm sorry, i was under the impression that when you reply to a thread your response is related to the topic. I didn't know that you post your frustrations with Warpath in random threads.

I have no idea why you have this personal vandetta against me? Unless you're the guy who lost his girlfriend to me. Otherwise, I can only conclude that you're merely here to stir up trouble and to deter forum members away from discussing the Redskins in a clear, concise, and mature manner; as evident by your quoted post.

If you feel you must continue such a conversation with me, save everybody the trouble and PM me. Otherwise, back off and stop high-jacking the tread.

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum