What's with the fumbles?

It seemed to go unnoticed, because we won and it didn't hurt us, but did anyone else see how many times we put the ball on the ground on Sunday?

Yeah we've mentioned it various times this week

It's called - GOOD DEFENSE.

na they were practiceing the scramble drill thats all

It's called - GOOD DEFENSE.
Some of those fumbles were not forced at all.

Some of those fumbles were not forced at all.

They all looked forced to me. The great hit on Betts caused the fumble, the other three were pushed out.

After failing to recover the majority of fumbles forced on defense this season, it was nice to see the opposition having a hard time recovering Redskin's fumbles. It's about time that the early season turnover disparity is starting balance out.

Turnovers is a non-issue this year, we don't turn the ball over and the defence doesn't get any either. The skins t.o. margin is -1.

NFL.com - NFL Stats (http://www.nfl.com/stats/teamsort/NFL/DEF-TURNOVERS/2006/regular)

Turnovers is a non-issue this year, we don't turn the ball over and the defence doesn't get any either. The skins t.o. margin is -1.

NFL.com - NFL Stats (http://www.nfl.com/stats/teamsort/NFL/DEF-TURNOVERS/2006/regular)
Are you kidding me. Apparently you were not paying attention the beginning of the season. A majority of the turnovers have come over the last 2-3 games.

Turnovers is a huge issue. If we dont continue to force turnovers, then we will not continue to win.

If we didnt get the turnover we got in the Carolina game, we might have lost.

The Carolina game is the only game this year I can think of where a turnover played a decisive roll. Last year I remember few games that the skins could have won if they held on to the ball better (KC and Denver come to mind).

I don't think this team can attribute any of their loses to turnovers this year. Of course if their defence had created more turnovers this season, then maybe they'd have more wins though.