redsk1
11-20-2006, 03:26 PM
I like the show better w/ czaban. I think he calls it like it is and is usually right on and isn't scared to say what he thinks good and bad.
I thought the question to Brunell was "ballsy." I felt bad for MB. I wouldn't have done it, but thats what reporters do. That ask the tough questions. You know, I like MB but sometimes as a fan i just want to hear him say, you know what i sucked today and the team wasn't any better. I think Czaban was trying to get him to say something like that.
If its true i'm sure someone high up at the skins (in the family) pulled some strings.
irish
11-20-2006, 03:42 PM
The guy is a tool anyway.
I thought it was a bit unprofessional on his part to try to ruffle Brunell's feathers. Seriously, what good does it serve?
I thought it was totally professional by Czab. Its his job to ask questions and too bad if anybody's feathers get ruffled. He asked the question everyone was thinking. To Brunell's credit his feathers didnt get ruffled and he answered the question like the pro he is.
On yesterday's show none of the guys in the studio directly asked any players questions so the show was a real yawner but hey at least none of the redskins had their delicate psyche damaged or their feathers ruffled by some mean and nasty reporter's questions.
SouperMeister
11-20-2006, 03:53 PM
I bet the Skins Front Office pulled that plug!
Without question. They did the same to Czabe after he did the Joe Gibbs radio show during the 2004 season, insisting that Gibbs would only return to the show in 2005 if Czaban were replaced. He was, by Bram Weinstein. This town handles the Skins with kid gloves, with George Michael leading the way. Czabe's questions to Brunell wouldn't have been a blip on the radar in Philly or New York.
There's a big difference between asking tough questions and being an ass. Czaban is an ass, very simple.
irish
11-20-2006, 04:00 PM
There's a big difference between asking tough questions and being an ass. Czaban is an ass, very simple.
I'm not a big Czab fan and he does say some things I dont agree with but how was he an ass asking MB a question we were all thinking?
dmek25
11-20-2006, 04:00 PM
The guy is a tool anyway.
I thought it was a bit unprofessional on his part to try to ruffle Brunell's feathers. Seriously, what good does it serve?
there isnt anything else to be said about czaban. anyone who missed him yesterday probably beleves fox news is objective
I'm not a big Czab fan and he does say some things I dont agree with but how was he an ass asking MB a question we were all thinking?
He wasn't looking for an answer by asking that question. He knew it was going to irk Brunell, and that's the only reason why he asked the question.
He was acting like a bitter fan. Sorry that's just not professional to me.
there isnt anything else to be said about czaban. anyone who missed him yesterday probably beleves fox news is objective
What next? Santa didn't get my letter?????
Daseal
11-20-2006, 04:09 PM
Someone needs to ask tougher questions around Redskins Park. I don't care if someone gets offended. Know what's offensive? Watching these guys play every week.
That Guy
11-20-2006, 04:10 PM
czab is a lot better than whoever replaced him. too bad you're not able to ask players questions. If mitchell asked the same thing, nothing would have happened. It's a crock that the skins can play this poorly and no one's allowed to question them about it.