illdefined
11-14-2006, 12:02 AM
First of all they aren't my ratings. I don't make em up. Secondly, what are you saying? That because the opponent leaves RBs open and we exploit it...we suck?
Randle El and Lloyd have been worse than replacement this season (see earlier post, this thread) Cooley is having the worst season of his career, although he's picking it up of late.
And those stats I give attempt to eliminate the Brunell factor. So that isn't the issue. This arguement that Brunell has great weapons is off the mark. He has Moss (8+ DPAR/G). Period.
Here's a shocker, Moss is good. Betts is having a good year. TELL THE PEOPLES!!!
The one consistent factor keeping the offensive efficiency ratings up was Brunell, and he's gone so look for them to drop hard.
I could take out all the good plays and leave the bad if I wanted to, but that wouldn't tell me anything. What are you trying to say?
no you don't make those ratings up, but you're seriously the only one on this planet who gives a f*** about them. i bet even the people who run the website you get those stats from all agree it was time for Campbell. how the hell can you get rid of the QB factor on whether a receiver is doing well or not? how can they do well if they haven't been getting the ball?
Betts has been racking up garbage free yards given to him by umbrella defenses on hopeless 3rd and longs all season. i'm serious, you should see how much of these ratings are based on Betts' 'production'. you'll be surprised on how much he's responsible for all the offensive 'success'. HE'S your real stat blimping hero.
Randle El and Lloyd have been worse than replacement this season (see earlier post, this thread) Cooley is having the worst season of his career, although he's picking it up of late.
And those stats I give attempt to eliminate the Brunell factor. So that isn't the issue. This arguement that Brunell has great weapons is off the mark. He has Moss (8+ DPAR/G). Period.
Here's a shocker, Moss is good. Betts is having a good year. TELL THE PEOPLES!!!
The one consistent factor keeping the offensive efficiency ratings up was Brunell, and he's gone so look for them to drop hard.
I could take out all the good plays and leave the bad if I wanted to, but that wouldn't tell me anything. What are you trying to say?
no you don't make those ratings up, but you're seriously the only one on this planet who gives a f*** about them. i bet even the people who run the website you get those stats from all agree it was time for Campbell. how the hell can you get rid of the QB factor on whether a receiver is doing well or not? how can they do well if they haven't been getting the ball?
Betts has been racking up garbage free yards given to him by umbrella defenses on hopeless 3rd and longs all season. i'm serious, you should see how much of these ratings are based on Betts' 'production'. you'll be surprised on how much he's responsible for all the offensive 'success'. HE'S your real stat blimping hero.