hesscl34
11-13-2006, 02:26 PM
I'll feel like Saunders has completely taken over and that is why this team sucks right now.
How will you feel if its Collins instead of Campbell?hesscl34 11-13-2006, 02:26 PM I'll feel like Saunders has completely taken over and that is why this team sucks right now. MTK 11-13-2006, 02:27 PM How in the hell did Ramsey look "pretty solid" with this stat line: 6 of 11, 105 yards, 0 TD, 1 INT, sacked twice, 2 fumbles, 49.4 QB rating. Yeah, really freaking solid. Solidly bad. This crap about Ramsey looking good in that game is one of the stupidest arguments ever discussed on any message board. skinsguy 11-13-2006, 02:28 PM This crap about Ramsey looking good in that game is one of the stupidest arguments ever discussed on any message board. Actually I think he said that Ramsey looked "great." BrunellMVP? 11-13-2006, 02:29 PM i can see the benefit of keeping the enormous pressure of JC, by not naming him the starter outright, but...lets get this over with, a spade is a spade, and the redskins are losers this year. no question or doubt about it. given the fact that we are losers, and therefore expected to loser, where is the pressure really coming from? i for one will not expect anything Great from JC this year, i just want to see signs...and progress...at this point, its anyone but brunell RedskinRat 11-13-2006, 02:30 PM Here's my guess: Brunell starts against the Bucs, we win. Everyone gets all happy with the win and forgets that we need a QB change. I use some very bad language as I see Brunell set up under Center. BrunellMVP? 11-13-2006, 02:32 PM How in the hell did Ramsey look "pretty solid" with this stat line: 6 of 11, 105 yards, 0 TD, 1 INT, sacked twice, 2 fumbles, 49.4 QB rating. Yeah, really freaking solid. Solidly bad. This crap about Ramsey looking good in that game is one of the stupidest arguments ever discussed on any message board. you have to agree with MAtty here...in no way are those stats "solid". i would point out, that Ramsey tossed for 105 yards (on 6 completions), thats 27 fewer yards than brunell with 10 less completitons (sounds about right). dmek25 11-13-2006, 02:34 PM how old is Jason Campbell? my friend insists he is 26 years old. if that is the case, he had better get his ass under center sometime this season. no one in the redskins organization really knows if this guy can play in this league. sooner or later we are going to have to find out skinsguy 11-13-2006, 02:34 PM Here's my guess: Brunell starts against the Bucs, we win. Everyone gets all happy with the win and forgets that we need a QB change. I use some very bad language as I see Brunell set up under Center. I have a feeling you're probably going to be right. SmootSmack 11-13-2006, 02:37 PM how old is Jason Campbell? my friend insists he is 26 years old. if that is the case, he had better get his ass under center sometime this season. no one in the redskins organization really knows if this guy can play in this league. sooner or later we are going to have to find out 24 RedskinRat 11-13-2006, 02:38 PM And when I say 'Everyone' I don't include myself. I think we should have started Campbell from Game 1. Brunell will be a truly great mentor, he seems like a super-nice guy but not a starting QB any more. Old warriors don't know when to quit. |
|
EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum