How will you feel if its Collins instead of Campbell? [Archive] - Page 11


	Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum > How will you feel if its Collins instead of Campbell? PDA How will you feel if its Collins instead of Campbell? Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [11] Big C 11-13-2006, 04:52 PM im just ready for a change now. atleast saunders trusts collins Daseal 11-13-2006, 04:52 PM Great game was an overstatement certainly, but he played in an equal capacity to Brunell. Ramsey is ramsey, he'll throw more INTs than Brunell (but Brunell will make that up in fumbles) and when our defense was playing like it was, you could afford more turnovers if you moved the ball. Plus, I don't consider 1 quarter much of a chance to prove yourself. MTK 11-13-2006, 04:53 PM Are you saying he didn't play better in the 1st quarter than Brunell played the rest of the game? I was at the game and other than the INT, he played well. And, was going up against one of the better D's in the NFL. Granted I was drinking A LOT before and during the game, but from what I remember he played well. lay off the name. We will have another #56 soon. Maybe Rocky will change his number This is what I said in another thread: How in the hell did Ramsey look "pretty solid" with this stat line: 6 of 11, 105 yards, 0 TD, 1 INT, sacked twice, 2 fumbles, 49.4 QB rating. Yeah, really freaking solid. Solidly bad. This crap about Ramsey looking good in that game is one of the stupidest arguments ever discussed on any message board. Yes, Brunell definitely played better than Ramsey in that game. His stat line from that game: 8 of 14, 70 yards, 0 TD, 0 INT, 1 sack, 0 fumbles, 70.5 QB rating. skinsguy 11-13-2006, 04:56 PM Why are we even discussing Patrick Ramsey? MTK 11-13-2006, 05:01 PM Great game was an overstatement certainly, but he played in an equal capacity to Brunell. Ramsey is ramsey, he'll throw more INTs than Brunell (but Brunell will make that up in fumbles) and when our defense was playing like it was, you could afford more turnovers if you moved the ball. Plus, I don't consider 1 quarter much of a chance to prove yourself. Great, good, solid... none of those terms fit when describing his performance that day. The fact is he played like shit. 1 INT and 2 fumbles in 1 quarter and people describe that as playing well? Please, that's just insanely ridiculous. Brunell came in and didn't play great or good, but he was solid enough to help contribute to the win. I'm not going to even argue about this "he only had 1 quarter to prove himself" nonsense. If you really believe the decision to bench him was made on that 1 quarter of football you are insane. illdefined 11-13-2006, 05:02 PM Why are we even discussing Patrick Ramsey? for real. i liked the guy and still dont see why we're still talking about him. the only thing relevant about him today is as a reminder of the inconsistency of Gibbs' QB yanking policy. MTK 11-13-2006, 05:04 PM Why are we even discussing Patrick Ramsey? Today is dig into the past day and find every little thing this team has done wrong in the past 20 years and throw that at the feet of the current team. It's perfectly relevant to discuss players, coaches, front office staff that aren't here anymore and have no impact on the current team. C'mon man get with the program. ;) RedskinRat 11-13-2006, 06:33 PM Shut the thread down, it's a moot point now. illdefined 11-13-2006, 06:35 PM lets shut every Collins/Brunell thread down now. PLEASE. they are BACKUPS. :) :) :) skinsguy 11-13-2006, 06:36 PM lets shut every Collins/Brunell thread down now. PLEASE. they are BACKUPS. :) :) :) Hahaha.....somebody warn Offiss! ;)