T.A.P.O.A.F.O.R.
11-13-2006, 01:14 PM
i'll log in a solid #2 for a few weeks now. incidentally, what does this have to do with a rorschach test? i thought it was a visual test where you're supposed to see what you want to see. . . oh, i get it.
Take 70Chip's Mark Brunell Rorshock TestT.A.P.O.A.F.O.R. 11-13-2006, 01:14 PM i'll log in a solid #2 for a few weeks now. incidentally, what does this have to do with a rorschach test? i thought it was a visual test where you're supposed to see what you want to see. . . oh, i get it. Pocket$ $traight 11-13-2006, 01:17 PM i'll log in a solid #2 for a few weeks now. incidentally, what does this have to do with a rorschach test? i thought it was a visual test where you're supposed to see what you want to see. . . oh, i get it. I like that.... MTK 11-13-2006, 02:33 PM http://www.thewarpath.net/redskins-locker-room/15693-take-70chips-mark-brunell-rorshock-test-10.html#post244173 this was the first Tripp post had after the game, kinda out of left field (he said he was just expressing the opposite view) and riled a lot of people up. I understand what he's saying but I disagree about us owing Brunell anything. He's had his time and now it's clearly time to start thinking about a future that doesn't involve him. Regarding the switch and when it will happen, I said a few weeks ago that I don't expect the change to be made until we hit 7 losses. 70chip13083 11-13-2006, 02:41 PM We certainly do not owe Brunell anything. Once you cannot competently perform your job, you lose your job. Business is business. I do agree that a change will probably not be made until we've hit 7 loses. If there is a change before this, it will be Collins rather than Campell, as the coaches will want to see if we have a better chance with an Al Saunders guy running the Saunders system. I'd hate to see this happen though BDBohnzie 11-13-2006, 04:26 PM I'm a #2. Before the Eagles game, I was still a #3, but now I'm definitely teetering on the #2 fence. However, what we all think is completely different from the reality that is Brunell will most likely start against Bucs, and even the Panthers before the Skins are mathematically out of it. We can all scream for Campbell until we pass out from exhaustion, but Gibbs and Saunders have a game plan, and will execute it until a playoff bid is completely lost. Campbell is going to get some playing time this year, but the question is when. Oh, and I cracked up about the Andrew Walter comparison, here are the stats: Brunell (#10) 162-260 (62.3%), 1789 yds, 8 TDs, 4 INTs, 3-6 record, Offense has scored 165 points, 48 of 165 from TD passes Walter (#34, last among Qualified Leaders) 104-216 (48.1%), 1305 yds, 3 TDs, 9 INTs, 2-7 record, Offense has scored 105 points, 18 of 105 from TD passes MTK 11-13-2006, 04:29 PM I'm a #2. Before the Eagles game, I was still a #3, but now I'm definitely teetering on the #2 fence. However, what we all think is completely different from the reality that is Brunell will most likely start against Bucs, and even the Panthers before the Skins are mathematically out of it. We can all scream for Campbell until we pass out from exhaustion, but Gibbs and Saunders have a game plan, and will execute it until a playoff bid is completely lost. Campbell is going to get some playing time this year, but the question is when. Oh, and I cracked up about the Andrew Walter comparison, here are the stats: Brunell (#10) 162-260 (62.3%), 1789 yds, 8 TDs, 4 INTs, 3-6 record, Offense has scored 165 points, 48 of 165 from TD passes Walter (#34, last among Qualified Leaders) 104-216 (48.1%), 1305 yds, 3 TDs, 9 INTs, 2-7 record, Offense has scored 105 points, 18 of 105 from TD passes Yeah but he's 10 times better than Brunell. Ok maybe not 10 times, just 2 times. :rolleyes: Pocket$ $traight 11-13-2006, 06:04 PM Yeah but he's 10 times better than Brunell. Ok maybe not 10 times, just 2 times. :rolleyes: Yeah, cause all of those garbage stats that Brunell accumulated tell the real story. Use your eyes for once. Smarten' up. MTK 11-13-2006, 06:13 PM Yeah, cause all of those garbage stats that Brunell accumulated tell the real story. Use your eyes for once. Smarten' up. Great way to explain your "logic". Smarten up? LOL please dude, I'm literally laughing at you right now. Laughing. Pocket$ $traight 11-13-2006, 06:17 PM Great way to explain your "logic". Smarten up? LOL please dude, I'm literally laughing at you right now. Laughing. What you think means nothing to me. You exposed yourself today. Paraphrase "Shows that we will fight"... Are we all in this together Matty? Was Lavar scheduled to go in certain packages? (Insert Archuletta if you feel like it). If I want to hear the Gibbs press conference, I will listen to a blog over and over. Keep drinking the Kool-Aid... MTK 11-13-2006, 07:43 PM What you think means nothing to me. You exposed yourself today. Paraphrase "Shows that we will fight"... Are we all in this together Matty? Was Lavar scheduled to go in certain packages? (Insert Archuletta if you feel like it). If I want to hear the Gibbs press conference, I will listen to a blog over and over. Keep drinking the Kool-Aid... Alright, you know what I'm done with playing these stupid games with you. Mainly because I can't figure out what the hell you are talking about, but also because this is childish. Sorry if I offended you in any way. Let's just move on and be happy that Campbell is finally going to start. Believe it or not I am happy about the move. |
|
EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum