ROMO??? Why not JC???

Pages : 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7

Chief X_Phackter
10-30-2006, 02:51 PM
Campbell is very green. But there's only one way to make him less green: Let him play! Preferrably ASAP.

Campbell will get his turn eventually, and he'll probably do ok. He is in his seventh different offensive system in as many years. He would not outplay Mark Brunell right now or anytime this year for that matter. Romo had the pleasure of being in the same system for a few years, that is why he looked decent last night. He is comfortable with the system. I still think the jury is out on whether it was a good move to bench Bledsoe.

illdefined
10-30-2006, 03:04 PM
I'd say if Brunell comes out playing like crap in this game I'd make the switch. And with as well as he's played this year, normally you have to take a bad game every once in a while because nobody is perfect. But because it's Dallas, and because our backs are up against the wall, Brunell needs to continue to play at a high level, or they should make the switch mid game.


sigh i don't know how you keep saying Brunell has been playing at such a 'high' level. if he was, we wouldn't even be considering about talking about switching. you're a big fan of stats, here's a nice retort about stats from the WP:

"More delicate is the acknowledgment of both the coaching staff and players that, at least offensively, statistics can be misleading. The team is producing similar numbers, but not similar results, as last season. The coaches want to work more closely with Brunell, especially on his dropbacks on passing plays and his reading of defenses. While Brunell is a more accurate passer this year than a year ago, the coaching staff wants to emphasize to him that, in associate head coach Al Saunders's offense, decision-making must be immediate. Brunell's habit of dropping into the pocket, scanning the field and then patting the football has disrupted the timing of the offense, coaches say, and forced him to throw to a safety-valve receiver, most often a running back.

Last season after seven games, the running back tandem of Ladell Betts and Portis had combined for 20 receptions. This season, Betts and Portis have 38 catches."

that's almost double for you math types. this is behind the exact same offensive line as last year and perfectly illustrates Brunell's trouble with this new system. yes, maybe some of these were designed, but not double, is this what we brought Lloyd and Randle El here for? can't wait to hear how this is the defense's fault...

MTK
10-30-2006, 03:07 PM
Here's my prediction, if Brunell starts slow against Dallas and we get behind early, Campbell could get his shot. He's been taking a lot of snaps lately in practice, partly due to Brunell being banged up but one has to believe the main reason is the coaches realize they have to start getting him ready.

The rumors out of Redskins Park is they are getting Campbell ready for action "sooner rather than later". That time could be just around the corner.

TheBigD
10-30-2006, 03:13 PM
I still think the jury is out on whether it was a good move to bench Bledsoe.

Here is what I persoanlly think about the situation, I am really happy to see Bledsoe watching Romo from the sidelines. I have nothing against Bledsoe but he is not that good. Bledsoe and Brunell for that matter, were at the end of their careers when Dallas and Washington got them. We all know that if it wasn't for their ties with the coaches, they wouldn't get the job. Seriously, those two guys were never GREAT, just good, and they have only gotten worse.

The other issue is Dallas needs to find out if Romo is the quarterback of the future or not. If not Dallas would need to trade up in the draft to get Quinn or whoever is the top QB prospect. Let's face there has been many first round pick QBs that didn't make it big in the NFL, it's just not for them, college and NFL are different and we all know that(like Marcus Vick who is a WR/QB now, Robinson from Penn who is a RB, Matt Jones who is a WR now).

Benching Bledsoe was a smart decision even if Dallas loses the remaining games and I think the same thing should be done with Burnell, but again it is just my opinion.

Twilbert07
10-30-2006, 03:17 PM
Campbell will get his turn eventually, and he'll probably do ok. He is in his seventh different offensive system in as many years. He would not outplay Mark Brunell right now or anytime this year for that matter. Romo had the pleasure of being in the same system for a few years, that is why he looked decent last night. He is comfortable with the system. I still think the jury is out on whether it was a good move to bench Bledsoe.

Campbell might not be able to outplay Brunell now, but he would deliver an intangible: a spark. Brunell gives me little hope that he'll ever do anything but "manage" more losses and an occasional win.

memphisskin
10-30-2006, 03:19 PM
Ok the reason I belive JC isn't starting yet it's that Gibbs just doesn't think he's ready or Campbell hasn't showed him in practice he manages this system (hey Brunnel doesn't either but still).

As 1 pointed out Campbell didn't show a lot in preseason against backups maybe his just 2 green.

I'll give you that he's green, but oh what talent he has. I think the qb position is important, but one of only 22 starting spots on a team. We've got bigger fish to fry, like finding our running game, getting our offense on the same page, and stopping the explosive plays that are ravaging our defense.

As for JC showing anything in practice, well he's running the scout team so there aren't that many opportunities for him to show much of anything. Thanks for the insight tho, d'boyz.

As much as I like the egalitarian in Parcells for starting an undrafted free agent at QB, what happens when Romo starts to slide? Nice game by the UDA last night, lets see how he handles himself in DC.

The Zimmermans
10-30-2006, 03:20 PM
Brunell has less of an arm than many high school QB's it's absolutely rediculous watching and routing for him. It's like watching Rudy try to make a tackle. The pain and anguish he has cause all of us in two of the last three years is reason enough to put someone else in for ONE DRIVE please

illdefined
10-30-2006, 03:25 PM
it'd be stupid to think our running woes aren't in direct correlation to Brunell's passing tendencies.

it's gotten to the point where it just sucks to see any other NFL game. seeing all these passes made in the middle of the field on slants, sideline streaks, end zone fades, passes caught over the shoulder and in stride...why the hell is washington exempt???

PWNED
10-30-2006, 03:30 PM
yeah, i mean this is what you do. you throw the jump ball to lloyd, let him come down with it. he did it all last year in san fran,.

redskins5044
10-30-2006, 04:35 PM
if brunell comes out slow in the dallas game and we dont score some points early. the fans at fed-ex will be calling for his head and i will be one of them. we are 2-5 we arent going anywhere with brunell at QB this isnt last year we would need to win 8 of 9 games to have a chance to make the playoffs. not happening with teams left we have to play. we need to let JC play bottom line. my predicition before the Indy game was if we lost JC would start doesnt look like that is going to happen. if we lose to dallas it better be JC who starts the rest of the season. i dont want to hear we played our guts out. or it wasnt marks fault. i dont care if it is his fault or not he is not the future here. i know some fans dont like when people scritize Gibbs but this not 80's or early 90's anymore this is what have u done for me latley league and hes hasnt done much yet. if he says he will be here two more years like he say he is lets move on

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum