Should the Redskins make a run at Brady Quinn?

brady quinn cant take a hit for shit, he wont last 2 seasons in the nfl

Hell No! Hail From Mcusa!

At this rate, we'll have a #3 or 4 pick and could pick up Brady. Keep in mind we are only 1 win away from being the worst team in football.

Why not take Calvin Johnson from GT? I mean he's 6'5'' ,240 lbs, and runs a sub 4.4 40. He and JC could become the next great QB/WR tandem in the league! WHY NOT?! HAIL from MCUSA!

Why not take Calvin Johnson from GT? I mean he's 6'5'' ,240 lbs, and runs a sub 4.4 40. He and JC could become the next great QB/WR tandem in the league! WHY NOT?! HAIL from MCUSA!

We need another receiver about as much as we need Bruce Smith back. Now, given that we have the worst front office in football, that is exactly what we will do.

Im not sold on Brady Quinn yet.

Took the words right out of my mouth!

Theres an article written in the Pro Football Prospectus 2006 that has a good track record of projecting QBs based on their college stats, based on using Games Started and Completion %, and high numbers of both seem to correlate to success in the NFL. Campbell's projection is off the charts. Your boy, Alex Smith, fares pretty well by it too.

Quinns a 4 year starter for a major program in which his career completion % will hover around 60% at the end of the season. That's good for the system.

It has been wrong before. But in general, if you suck (a term used loosely, cause of the hype factor) in college, like Kyle Boller, who vastly outplayed his projection, you won't be much in the NFL.

you're hanging your hat too much on that article. that article projects kyle boller as the best NFL QB EVER, so it's a bit flawed. i believe campbell will probably be above average, but probably not mcnabb like.

brady quinn projects better, but he isn't all that tough and he's erratic (like eli manning). sometimes he just forgets all the rules about technique and justs plays awful... but he usually turns it around within the same game.

I think if jarret or johnson declare early, they're actually safer picks. Either way, quinn is probably a raider, and i don't think we'll be able to trade up that high (it gets really expensive) and take that big a contract for yet another QB if we can't at least see what the last QB we traded up and drafted can do for us :P.

Why not take Calvin Johnson from GT? I mean he's 6'5'' ,240 lbs, and runs a sub 4.4 40. He and JC could become the next great QB/WR tandem in the league! WHY NOT?! HAIL from MCUSA!

he's got football speed, but his last timed 40s were in the 4.55 range.

and you don't need to add hail from mcusa on every damned post. it's just annoying.

We need another receiver about as much as we need Bruce Smith back. Now, given that we have the worst front office in football, that is exactly what we will do.

that's true, and we don't need adrian peterson either. but the top 5 (if 4 underclassmen declare) could be a QB, a RB, and 3 WRs. calvin johnson may very well be the best talent in the entire draft. either way, that'd be 3 positions we're hopefully okay at... but until we see campbell we can't know. Best talent available does have it's merits though, if you can get good baseline talent with cheap/vet min FA signings. Johnson could be TO+ with a great work ethic and team attitude.

cb is looking a bit weak. there's a GW type corner (6'1" 195) up near the top and some DEs and a DT... more depth at OL and LB though. posluszny (OLB) would be a fairly safe pick in the top 10 range...

No. Trade down (if possible). If not, go for best available (within reason).