Offseason plan for 2007

obtain depth at every position

Chris Samuels? I agree man, bring back Jake!!

lol, I agree with that.

Isn't it contradictory to say the talent is there but then say we need someone else calling the shots on personnel?

I don't think it's a contradiction. There IS a lot of talent on the team...mostly at the offensive skill positions, but I also said that we need to add to a few key positions, and I don't think the UFA route is the best one personally. It seems like we are at about a 30% hit rate with our FA's and we certainly pay too much for them, which hinders our ability to stock depth. A good GM would look to fill the voids through a balanced approach to the draft and free agency. In other words, look at the voids we have while looking for "system" guys that can be productive without breaking the bank allowing for more talented back-ups at positions like O-line and the defensive secondary.

I also said that this GM would have to have the backbone to tell Gibbs when a player was a bum, preferrably in the offseason (i.e., let guys go that can't perform so there isn't an option, Cough *brunell* Cough).

Look at what San Diego did with the QB position in the offseason. Management decided that Brees' trade value exceeded his value to the club, especially with a first round QB pick riding the pine. Marty didn't like it, but it has reaped dividens for the organization. I believe that is what we need in Washington.

I voted for moderate changes because we do have at this time several needs to be dealt with, mostly on defense, and the kicking game. However since we still have nine games left in this season we'll have to see how it plays out. Our needs could change between now and then. We definately do not need to make wholesale changes, in my opinion that would be a step backwards.

Provided that Campbell shows some promise, I would make him the starter and not touch any of the other starters on offense. I would, however, find another backup offensive lineman.

On defense, I would make a few changes. Provided that we see some of Rocky and like what we see, I would make him the starter. I would add a starting-caliber defensive tackle. Finally, I would add a quality #2 corner who could start, but who would not blow up upon being relegated to nickel duties if Rogers improves enough to warrrant a starting job.

On special teams, I would get a reliable kicker and punter. Novak clearly is not the answer. Frost could be a keeper, but he's been inconsistent.

Finally, and MOST importantly, I would keep the entire coaching staff intact.
I honestly believe that our defensive woes are a reflection of the injuries, NOT Williams. I also honestly believe that Saunders' offense will work in year 2. I cannot understand how any fan who has followed the Redskins for any period of time could ask for an overhaul of our coaching staff. Has anyone learned that turnover on the coaching staff wreaks havoc on a team's identity and performance?

Provided that Campbell shows some promise, I would make him the starter and not touch any of the other starters on offense. I would, however, find another backup offensive lineman.

On defense, I would make a few changes. Provided that we see some of Rocky and like what we see, I would make him the starter. I would add a starting-caliber defensive tackle. Finally, I would add a quality #2 corner who could start, but who would not blow up upon being relegated to nickel duties if Rogers improves enough to warrrant a starting job.

On special teams, I would get a reliable kicker and punter. Novak clearly is not the answer. Frost could be a keeper, but he's been inconsistent.

Finally, and MOST importantly, I would keep the entire coaching staff intact.





I honestly believe that our defensive woes are a reflection of the injuries, NOT Williams. I also honestly believe that Saunders' offense will work in year 2. I cannot understand how any fan who has followed the Redskins for any period of time could ask for an overhaul of our coaching staff. Has anyone learned that turnover on the coaching staff wreaks havoc on a team's identity and performance?



I totally agree about the defense because in all honesty I was shocked at the way this defense played last year considering the talent level. It dosen't suprise me one bit to see it struggle this year with the injuries it's had. I knew when we began to experience injuries on the defense (starting with Springs) we were going to have serious problems. With a team that thin in important area's is bound to take a tumble if injury becomes a factor.

I would, however, find another backup offensive lineman.

On defense, I would make a few changes. Provided that we see some of Rocky and like what we see, I would make him the starter. I would add a starting-caliber defensive tackle. Finally, I would add a quality #2 corner who could start, but who would not blow up upon being relegated to nickel duties if Rogers improves enough to warrrant a starting job.

On special teams, I would get a reliable kicker and punter. Novak clearly is not the answer. Frost could be a keeper, but he's been inconsistent.



so good cb, good dt, good k, good p, backup OL... an we have a 1, 5, 6, 7.

if you want to go for it, there's a possible 2nd round kicker (crosby) that's hit a ton of kicks from 55+, and a great punter (sepulveda) that'll go in the 4th or 5th (averages over 46 per punt, holds on FGs).

for OL, ther's a good top 5 OT, that'd be overkill though :/. I don't know about low rounders, but jahri evans was a great guy available (and known about) in the later part of the second day last year. there is a big (6'0, 198) top 10 cb, but i don't know much about him yet. DT is a bit bare that high up, but there's a couple guys that might go in round 1 (one is around #30-35 though). We don't have enough picks to get all those guys though. either DT/CB, then try and find guys late, or trade down and use the 2nd or 3rd you pick up to get both. i don't see anyone that really stands out (outside quinn or peterson if he declares) yet, but its just too early.

Minimal. Try and trade down the 1st round pick for 2 2nd rounders, draft a CB and an OL. Don't sign any new starters, just depth. Start Campbell!!! Run a longer and tougher training camp. The offense will know the system better and there will be better chemistry. We have one of the most talented teams and the best coaches. We don't need to change much. And stop trading away draft picks. The best teams build through the draft.

Provided that Campbell shows some promise, I would make him the starter and not touch any of the other starters on offense. I would, however, find another backup offensive lineman.

On defense, I would make a few changes. Provided that we see some of Rocky and like what we see, I would make him the starter. I would add a starting-caliber defensive tackle. Finally, I would add a quality #2 corner who could start, but who would not blow up upon being relegated to nickel duties if Rogers improves enough to warrrant a starting job.

On special teams, I would get a reliable kicker and punter. Novak clearly is not the answer. Frost could be a keeper, but he's been inconsistent.

Finally, and MOST importantly, I would keep the entire coaching staff intact.
I honestly believe that our defensive woes are a reflection of the injuries, NOT Williams. I also honestly believe that Saunders' offense will work in year 2. I cannot understand how any fan who has followed the Redskins for any period of time could ask for an overhaul of our coaching staff. Has anyone learned that turnover on the coaching staff wreaks havoc on a team's identity and performance?


jesus...i havent had the heart to post anything after we sucked Manning's wang-dang but,......this is one of the best offseason scenarios/solutions that IVE EVER heard....bank on it...they follow those directions and were 13-3 next season....i havent the heart to post again till we win a fucking game...peace

I say minimal to moderate. Make the switch to Campbell, that's kind of a big deal. I think that means more than a minimal change. Also, I think you need to make a move for a young corner, a weakside LB, maybe another DT and a DE to replace Daniels. Not all of these need to be starters and not all of them need to be vets. They can draft any of them. I think that the Skins could use a cover saftey, but they're kinda married to Archuleta. Maybe AA will come into his own in the system, but if he's going to, it won't be as a cover guy. They need better corners to help him out.