tdSKINS1
10-17-2006, 01:55 PM
Yep i totally agree with everyone on running the football, we pay this guy so much and only give him 14 carries. The screen is great but not 30 times a game it seems like. And remember last year with Chris Cooley and how diverse he was in our offense wheres he now. 1 TD catch and how bout Mike Sellers didn't he have like 7 TD catches in the redzone. Its kind of frustrating with all this talent and we can't spread the ball. Give the playbook back to Gibbs.
onlydarksets
10-17-2006, 02:03 PM
We brought in two #2 receivers, and Cooley is still our second leading receiver, yardage-wise and TD-wise. The problem is not there.
As for Sellers, CP is getting the red zone TDs, which is fine by me.
Crat92
10-17-2006, 02:07 PM
You know AL saunders is not the one who locks in on one receiver every freakin' play! I wonder who that is.............................Sorry ass Brunell! I'll tell you where Chris Cooley is................ running open down the field while Brunell is too busy throwing to Moss in Triple Fuckin coverage!!!:banghead: HAIL from MCUSA!
illdefined
10-17-2006, 02:10 PM
only way to get Cooley the ball is if he's Bruney's number one read.
ArtMonkDrillz
10-17-2006, 03:09 PM
Listen to Cooley's most recent interview on EITM (I started a thread on it). Cooley says he feels like he's been getting open when he's supposed to and that he can't really do anything beyond that. He stopped short of calling out Brunell or saying there is a problem, but he definately sounded frustrated to me.
BDBohnzie
10-17-2006, 03:10 PM
Cooley's not the problem in this scenerio. He is also being used more in blocking schemes...since Brunell is quite fragile and can't scramble an egg, much less get out of the pocket anymore.
ArtMonkDrillz
10-17-2006, 03:13 PM
I think Cooley would catch a lot more passes if he would just run about 15' in front of Brunell when he scrambles and turns around.
Maybe Brunell just can't see that far down field. He should get laser surgery.
onlydarksets
10-17-2006, 03:20 PM
Considering that Cooley was the #2 option last year on pretty much every passing play, but is now the #3 or #4, I don't see Cooley's production being an issue. His numbers are down about 30% from the same time last year, but that is to be expected.
Cooley's numbers are completely irrespective of Brunell's (in)ability to check down to the open receiver.
memphisskin
10-17-2006, 03:26 PM
We brought in two #2 receivers, and Cooley is still our second leading receiver, yardage-wise and TD-wise. The problem is not there.
As for Sellers, CP is getting the red zone TDs, which is fine by me.
Really? I don't think Cooley is a problem, but getting him the ball definitely is. I thought he was playing the Tony Gonzalez role in this offense, which I thought meant that he was going to be a target on a lot more plays than just tight end screens and the check down on the play action rollouts that we can't seem to run without tipping cornerbacks off and limiting our own chances for success. Cooley is on pace to catch about 40 balls. We need him to catch at least 70. I wonder if he's dropped himself in his fantasy league?
illdefined
10-17-2006, 03:58 PM
I think Cooley would catch a lot more passes if he would just run about 15' in front of Brunell when he scrambles and turns around.
Maybe Brunell just can't see that far down field. He should get laser surgery.
in Brunell's defense, that's exactly the pass Brunell and Cooley connected on with that last TD.
like i said before, Cooley is only player big and slow enough for Brunell to hit over the middle.