|
|
Pages :
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
[ 12]
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
Beemnseven 10-15-2006, 10:00 PM Name me one quarterback in the league that has better stats, but worse weapons than Brunell does.
The reason you stay with Brunell is because he gives you the best chance to win. I know that. Joe Gibbs knows that. Al Saunders knows that.
Just one quarterback? That would be McNabb. 107 QB rating, 11 TDs, 1 pick with over 1600 yards passing. That's with no running game, Donte Stallworth who's been out for the past two games, somebody named Reggie Brown, and Brian Westbrook who's also been banged up this year.
As for Brunell giving us the best chance to win ... well, reasonable people can disagree. But we don't know what Al Saunders thinks. He has absolutely zero input on who gets to the field and takes snaps.
Brunell is not solely to blame. But I do believe that when the team is struggling, you makes changes where you can. Right now, there's nothing you can do with the defense. They are what they are. Brunell is not managing the game, he's been ineffective, and that did not start this season. Check out his stats after the injury he took to the knee in the second Giants game last season.
Since this defense will likely stay bad throughout the year, so the offense must begin to start clicking. You have to play Campbell sooner or later.
RedskinRat 10-15-2006, 10:00 PM If Campbell turns out to be 'not-that-good' then we're royally screwed. Just one thing: He's great, not just good.
Get Campbell in NOW to save this season.
Sheriff Gonna Getcha 10-15-2006, 10:03 PM If Campbell turns out to be 'not-that-good' then we're royally screwed. Just one thing: He's great, not just good.
Get Campbell in NOW to save this season.
RR,
I like your optimism and I pray that you are right. But what makes you so confident about JC? He might be great in the future, but I haven't seen anything to make me think he'd be better than Brunell, let alone great.
Beemnseven 10-15-2006, 10:08 PM Yeah he is average, only real positive is he is a vet, so he wont make that many costly turnovers in the middle of a game. I don't want Brunell in bc I am thinking about what is best for the team in the Long Run.
And guys guess what? What if Campbell turns out to be not that good?? Then wtf do we do? That is why he need atleast 6-7 games this year to get him up to NFL pace, otherwise we need to start looking for a QB again.
Brilliant point. Unfortunately, Gibbs will take as long as he can to figure that out. I still say there's a bit of pride on the line for Gibbs who's bound and determined to prove he was right about Brunell. He was right for the better part of the 2005 season. But his favorite beverage is tipped on its end ... and there's nothing left but drips.
jdlea 10-15-2006, 10:10 PM You don't know what Campbell's gonna be, but you do know what Brunell is and, more importantly, what he isn't. This team isn't winning with him in. They're 2 and 4, I don't buy that Campbell couldn't have beaten the Texans, so they might be 1 game worse, but what would be the difference? If you don't think this season is over, then (like I said in another thread) you have my permission to throw this in my face when they make the playoffs. When that happens I'll say "You were right and I was wrong." Until that happens, I'm gonna go with my knowledge of football and realize that they have very little shot at making the playoffs.
For everyone who believes the season isn't over, please tell me which 8 games they're going to win:
Colts
Cowboys
Eagles
Bucs
Panthers
Falcons
Eagles
Saints
Rams
Giants
Just tell which 8 they'll win. And I really don't wanna hear about winning 5 straight last season cause they played defense then.
railcon56 10-15-2006, 10:15 PM It will take at least a broken leg before Gibbs will yank markie mark. But he sure showed a quick hook last year with old patrick.....
Mc2guy 10-15-2006, 10:17 PM You don't know what Campbell's gonna be, but you do know what Brunell is and, more importantly, what he isn't. This team isn't winning with him in. They're 2 and 4, I don't buy that Campbell couldn't have beaten the Texans, so they might be 1 game worse, but what would be the difference? If you don't think this season is over, then (like I said in another thread) you have my permission to throw this in my face when they make the playoffs. When that happens I'll say "You were right and I was wrong." Until that happens, I'm gonna go with my knowledge of football and realize that they have very little shot at making the playoffs.
For everyone who believes the season isn't over, please tell me which 8 games they're going to win:
Colts
Cowboys
Eagles
Bucs
Panthers
Falcons
Eagles
Saints
Rams
Giants
Just tell which 8 they'll win. And I really don't wanna hear about winning 5 straight last season cause they played defense then.
We'll said, couldn't agree more.
skinsguy 10-15-2006, 10:18 PM It will take at least a broken leg before Gibbs will yank markie mark. But he sure showed a quick hook last year with old patrick.....
And how is ol' Patrick doing this year? [/sarcasm]
Beemnseven 10-15-2006, 10:20 PM It will take at least a broken leg before Gibbs will yank markie mark. But he sure showed a quick hook last year with old patrick.....
Yep. I heard a local beat writer for the Skins once say that the only other quarterback Gibbs showed less patience for was Stan Humphries.
Sheriff Gonna Getcha 10-15-2006, 10:21 PM Not the Ramsey-Brunell thing again.....
|