Bring on Mr. McIntosh, Warrick is Terrible in Coverage [Archive] - Page 2


	Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum > Bring on Mr. McIntosh, Warrick is Terrible in Coverage PDA Bring on Mr. McIntosh, Warrick is Terrible in Coverage Pages : 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 tika49 10-10-2006, 01:07 AM R us freakin kidding me Warrick is terrible maybe you better check your stats , he had 8 tackles in the game I believe just one behind Lemar Marshall you had 9. Many of the redskins defense missed tackles on Sunday. Also Warrick is right up there in the team ranks as far as overall tackles for the year and he does not even plays the entire game he comes out when they run that sorry ass nickle package. Warrick Holdman on defense is the least of our worries dude! PSUskinsfan11 10-10-2006, 02:14 AM Too bad we didn't take Thomas Howard in the draft instead of Rocky. Howard is a former saftey with great speed and would be much better in coverage. He is starting for the Raiders and it looks like Krik Morrison,Mike Huff, and him are the only thing going for that team on D. offiss 10-10-2006, 05:01 AM Well it's disconsurting to see another draft pick we just had to have can't beat out Warrick Holdman, whether or not Holdman is playing up to par is irrelevant, we gave up picks to get Rocky, if he is incapable of beating Holdman than there is a problem with our ability to evaluate talent. That Guy 10-10-2006, 05:56 AM R us freakin kidding me Warrick is terrible maybe you better check your stats , he had 8 tackles in the game I believe just one behind Lemar Marshall you had 9. Many of the redskins defense missed tackles on Sunday. Also Warrick is right up there in the team ranks as far as overall tackles for the year and he does not even plays the entire game he comes out when they run that sorry ass nickle package. Warrick Holdman on defense is the least of our worries dude! watch the game, not the stat line. he's not doing so hot. i mean, arch had 10 tackles, but he wasn't exactly a decisive factor in our win over the giants... oh yeah, i forgot, we lost. and gave up 500 yards in doing so. dmek25 10-10-2006, 07:37 AM its more than holdman. and i sgree with matty. why put a rookie into this diaster? rookies = rookie mistakes VTSkins897 10-10-2006, 10:00 AM the entire D as a whole is sucking. MTK 10-10-2006, 10:35 AM Well it's disconsurting to see another draft pick we just had to have can't beat out Warrick Holdman, whether or not Holdman is playing up to par is irrelevant, we gave up picks to get Rocky, if he is incapable of beating Holdman than there is a problem with our ability to evaluate talent. Williams has a history of bringing his rookie defenders along slowly, and with a vet who's playing well enough what's the rush? With the problems we have right now, tossing a rookie in the mix just might compound things. BrunellMVP? 10-10-2006, 10:42 AM Anyone but Rogers! he could be the worst corner in the NFL right now... bold statement...but has he done anything positive? MTK 10-10-2006, 10:48 AM Anyone but Rogers! he could be the worst corner in the NFL right now... bold statement...but has he done anything positive? There are plenty of guys that are far worse. BrunellMVP? 10-10-2006, 10:52 AM are any as big a disappointment?