Apparently Al Saunders did not know who was in at RB agaisnt JAX

Apparently Saunders told the media(sorry if it is a repost, I did not know this happened until right now), he did not know who was in at what time during the JAX game, because of Gibbs policy off the RBs sitting themselves out for a play or so when they are winded. Saunders told the media, he wished he had known, because he had specific plays for Betts and CP. Some of the guys at Comcast sportsnet say that could have been something significant that flew underneath the radar. They said it showed there might be a communication issue between Gibbs and Saunders, especially because Saunder told this to the media.

What do you guys think?

BTW: Did you guys see the LaVar interview on Comcast SportsNet? You could tell he was still pissed we didn't resign him, and he portrayed the issue kinda like a him against the world deal. Just pissed me off.

It might just have been a play with some quick mis communication. It's nothing I'd make a huge deal out of.

I think the Saunders issue has been mentioned, that he wasn't happy CP took himself out. Non-issue I think

As for LaVar, I'm sorry but give me TO and Haynesworth before you give me LaVar. I think I might actually be at the point where I just hate him

I think I might be at that point too. If Lavar was truly sorry about the way things ended here with him, he wouldn't have said shit. He was acting like we're missing out on his 1 tackle and 1 pass defensed during today's game.

this is a dupe thread, from the other one, most people thought that as long as portis is producing, he's done enough to earn some trust.

if lavar wanted to be here, he would be here. he gave the redskins almost 4 million dollars to leave. screw him. lets make a man law so no more lavar threads

This is really old news.