LBrown43
10-03-2006, 04:16 PM
So talk is that Andre Reed is a chinch for the Hall of Fame. WHY?????
He was never on a Super Bowl Winner. His numbers are almost the same as Art's except he had 19 more TD's. The only reason he had more TD's is he was the only reciever of any note on the Bills. In Art's tenure we had Saunders and Clark among others who were gifted guys. Otherwise their numbers are very similar.
I just don't get it. Here you have a guy like Art Monk that is/was the epitomy of class and grace and he gets slapped in the face. Reed was a hot head (wasn't it Reed who got upset in the Super Bowl and cost his team the game by jerking off his helmet?)
I just don't get it. I am not saying he was not a great reciever because he was. I just see very little difference between him and Art and really feel that Art should have been a first ballot guy.
I know I am preching to the choir here but I just don't get the brush off Art gets. Whats not to love about the guy!!!
He was never on a Super Bowl Winner. His numbers are almost the same as Art's except he had 19 more TD's. The only reason he had more TD's is he was the only reciever of any note on the Bills. In Art's tenure we had Saunders and Clark among others who were gifted guys. Otherwise their numbers are very similar.
I just don't get it. Here you have a guy like Art Monk that is/was the epitomy of class and grace and he gets slapped in the face. Reed was a hot head (wasn't it Reed who got upset in the Super Bowl and cost his team the game by jerking off his helmet?)
I just don't get it. I am not saying he was not a great reciever because he was. I just see very little difference between him and Art and really feel that Art should have been a first ballot guy.
I know I am preching to the choir here but I just don't get the brush off Art gets. Whats not to love about the guy!!!