Is anyone worried about Archuletta?

Pages : 1 2 3 4 [5]

Daseal
09-02-2006, 11:19 AM
SBF -- The guys around you doesn't mean you don't try to run with a receiver.

Adam Archeletta was an awful signing in my opinion. Ryan Clark wasn't a big name, but he doesn't have to be. He was solid. Besides the LT run, name one time Ryan Clark didn't play a really solid game. Not to mention, Taylor was really getting used to Ryan Clark. In the 60 seconds with Sean Taylor, when asked who his favorite athelete is, he said Ryan Clark. That is alone enough for me to want him in DC.

Adam Archeletta hasn't put a solid tackle on anyone that I've seen. He keeps going for the hit and not wrapping up. Remember what Santana did to Roy Williams. Expect to see that if Arch gets caught in coverage.

Defensewins
09-02-2006, 11:52 AM
IMO Ryan Clark was not solid or the the answer at SS.
He has more than adequate in pass coverage but his run support and lack of size really hurt the Skins in some critical moments last year. A few runningbacks made him look really bad in some crucial running plays last year.
Adam A. solves the Strong safety run support problem (Clark) from last year, but A.A. does get beat on pass plays on occasion.
We might have overpaid for A.A.

During the regular season, Coach Williams will run schemes that will protect A.A. on pass coverage.

MTK
09-02-2006, 12:14 PM
IMO Ryan Clark was not solid or the the answer at SS.
He has more than adequate in pass coverage but his run support and lack of size really hurt the Skins in some critical moments last year. A few runningbacks made him look really bad in some crucial running plays last year.
Adam A. solves the Strong safety run support problem (Clark) from last year, but A.A. does get beat on pass plays on occasion.
We might have overpaid for A.A.

During the regular season, Coach Williams will run schemes that will protect A.A. on pass coverage.

I definitely agree.

Clark was a nice role player. As a full-time starter he has some real limitations. AA is a nice upgrade in all facets of the position.

mooby
09-02-2006, 12:42 PM
The reason Adam got burned on several plays this preseason is because he was put in one on one coverage. G.W. wanted to see what Adam can and can't do, and it's obvious coverage is not his strong point. That's why in the regular season, we aren't gonna see Adam covering someone one on one. If there's one coach in the NFL that does a great job of masking a player's deficiences (sp?), it's G.W. I'm not worried.

vaoutlaws2006
09-02-2006, 01:13 PM
there is some good and bad with aa but isnt that the case with everyone...lets give him a chance. But yes by all means he is overpaid.

EXoffender
09-02-2006, 05:04 PM
Archuleta does what Greg Williams wants him to do. He uses the HitStick.

charlielyons
09-02-2006, 06:59 PM
arch is only a good run stopper, i personally perfer that we would have signed more depth and gave prielou the start, he seems to be more consistent

mooby
09-02-2006, 07:03 PM
arch is only a good run stopper, i personally perfer that we would have signed more depth and gave prielou the start, he seems to be more consistent

I kinda agree with this statement, Arch is great in run support, but pass coverage he isn't that great. Prioleau is decent in both aspects in pass coverage and run support.

charlielyons
09-02-2006, 07:09 PM
if springs is 100% arch will be fine with pass support on that side just dont leave him 1 on 1 very often

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum