June 1st Cuts/Pickups

Pages : [1] 2 3 4

SKINSnCANES
05-31-2004, 09:34 PM
Heres an article on the June 1st cuts.
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/columns/story?columnist=pasquarelli_len&id=1760925

Looks like Gardner is going to be back on the marker. How would you guys feel about Daryl Gardner being back on the Skins, mabye along with Joe Johnson we could have a pretty good, and completly knew defensive line.

Didnt Gardner get traded or picked up by the Bengals though, I thought we were talking about that a while back?

skins009
05-31-2004, 10:17 PM
he's already got a deal with the bengals. He's gonna sign with them.

Daseal
06-01-2004, 08:35 AM
Incentive filled contracts. All I have to say!

]<ing
06-01-2004, 10:43 AM
Incentive filled contracts. All I have to say!

WORD!

I've been saying this for years now -- make it a standard across the board. It would be the saving grace for proffesional sports in general.

PERFORMANCE BASED SALARIES.

MTK
06-01-2004, 10:48 AM
sounds great but try convincing the agents and the players, lol

SmootSmack
06-01-2004, 11:31 AM
Incentive based contracts are an interesting theory, but how would you reward someone like say Randy Thomas? He had a pretty good year last year but you wouldn't know it the way the team played. There are no real stats associated with him. I guess you could say sacks allowed, or offensive stats. But that can't reflect entirely on him, can it?

Skins fan 44
06-01-2004, 11:55 AM
Incentive based? Although a great idea and should be done. There will always be a team that will pay extra to get a player and if it does not work out waive him. The XFL had the right idea, just tried to be too much of a circus.

]<ing
06-01-2004, 01:58 PM
sounds great but try convincing the agents and the players, lol
I say, still give them a nice base, just not the obscene salaries they're making today.

What are they going to do, quit and bag groceries for $7 an hour?

Right now the players seem to have all of the power -- hell, they're getting coaches fired. The league needs to realize that there's no reason for it to be that way.

]<ing
06-01-2004, 01:59 PM
Incentive based contracts are an interesting theory, but how would you reward someone like say Randy Thomas? He had a pretty good year last year but you wouldn't know it the way the team played. There are no real stats associated with him. I guess you could say sacks allowed, or offensive stats. But that can't reflect entirely on him, can it?
Create team, as well as individual incentives.

Hogskin
06-01-2004, 04:18 PM
Well, incentives have some interesting plusses, but could end up being a real detriment. You would have players playing ONLY for the incentives that bring the $$, not caring about the aspects of their game that do not reward (and there will ALWAYS be some aspects that can not be quantified). Then you also would have guys being much more negative than they already are if they did not get enough time on the field. Every team would have 15 Corey Dillons. The NFL is the only pro sport with a structure that is extremely effective and successful. I say, don't tamper with it. I think the NFL owners realize this, also. (If it ain't broke, don't fix it). ML Baseball and NBA are the sports with salary issues that really need fixing.

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum