which player has more to prove

Pages : 1 2 [3] 4

SKINSnCANES
05-26-2004, 08:42 PM
Brunell doesnt have a lot to prove, because he could play great and still get beat out for his job, he'll just prove he also took advantage of the Snyder payout.

I think Samuels has the most to prove because if you are goin got be the top paid guy on the team you better damn well play atleast in the top 10 people on the team.

Our whole team has a whole has a lot to prove.

I think an easier question would be to name the people that dont have to improve, that would be a much shorter list.

jrocx69
05-26-2004, 10:58 PM
top of list: #1 is lavar... he has to prove he is the highest paid lb in football. he has the athletic ability yet i think he needs to use his head more in games. and gibbs will make sure its there. he isnt worth the highest paid lb yet, and this year will tell us being that he is under a proven defensive mindmaster and a HOF coach

#2 would be springs... he has to much to prove being that he dropped form #1 cb in SEA to #3 in one seasons time. and the other prob to overcome would be injuries.

the springs transaction made me a little nervous knowing antoine winfield was on the table and he is very very very agressive and played for williams last year. doesnt take the spotlight with ints but really knows how to keep the ball out of opposing players hands which i would prefer cuz the percentage is much higher of a deep ball caught by just going for the bat down

SKINSnCANES
05-26-2004, 11:09 PM
Im surprised they jumped at springs so fast as well. I hope he doesnt turn out to be one of those guys Snyder liked from years ago and dosent realize they arent up to par anymore.

Springs was third string last year?!? Behind who? They drafted Trufant but who played a head of springs when he was healthy.

SKINSnCANES
05-26-2004, 11:10 PM
thats kinda discouraging, I didnt think he was third string last year

SmootSmack
05-27-2004, 12:08 AM
Because of his injuries Springs played some nickelback last year, essentially meaning he was third cornerback. Jrocx, are you equating that with being third string?

Canes, as per your question I don't think John Hall has much to prove

jthor99
05-27-2004, 12:48 AM
I think without question it has to be Lavar Arrington....... I like Lavar but he has yet to live up to his potential its not his fault i mean 5 differnt cordinators is definetly rough and not his fault. but with the big contract and greg williams at def cord. he has to step up big time and be a team leader. It s a must i think he is an outstanding linebacker and with that talent around him i think his potential will finally shine.

SKINSnCANES
05-27-2004, 12:55 AM
Canes, as per your question I don't think John Hall has much to prove

Whatd I ask about Hall. I tried scrolling up to see if someone else mentioned Hall but I didnt see anything

SmootSmack
05-27-2004, 12:58 AM
I think an easier question would be to name the people that dont have to improve, that would be a much shorter list.

Canes, I was just saying that Hall doesn't have to improve or prove anything. I thought he was great last year

SKINSnCANES
05-27-2004, 01:01 AM
ahh. So I did ask a question.

Yea I would have said Hall, Thomas (I sense a pattern starting...), Coles (heh) and Jansen. Mabye McCants, he needs to prove he can continue to produce but he by no means underproduced his expectations for last year.

And by lookign at my list it seems we did a decent job of getting free agents last year. I hope we have the same luck this year

huntz
05-27-2004, 03:18 AM
I'll tell you who has a lot to prove. THE COACHING STAFF!!! All eyes in the NFL will be on Joe to see if he can duplicate the magic. He doesn't really have to prove he can do it for us; the true burgundy and gold legion. But everyone else will need proof he and Bugel can still win.

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum