hooskins
08-08-2006, 07:54 PM
With Owens and Glenn banged up, maybe this is a ranking for tandem bikes.
http://www.nbc5i.com/2006/0803/9625380_240X180.jpg
http://www.nbc5i.com/2006/0803/9625380_240X180.jpg
NFL Live top 5 receiver tandemshooskins 08-08-2006, 07:54 PM With Owens and Glenn banged up, maybe this is a ranking for tandem bikes. http://www.nbc5i.com/2006/0803/9625380_240X180.jpg jdlea 08-08-2006, 11:18 PM What about Randy Moss and Jerry Porter in Oakland? I had the same thought when I initially read the list. However, I am under the assumption that they don't think Porter will be a Raider this season. I mean, he's taking a pretty firm stance about wanting to be traded and I don't even know if he's in camp right now. On a side note...Have you seen JP this year? That kid is jacked up! He earned my respect last season when he hung onto the ball after ST gave him everything he had. I mean, I thought that was a wrap for the game and not only did Porter hang on, he came back into the game. I mean, he came off the field, but I was surprised he was able to return. That was one of the sickest hits I've seen ST lay on someone and he hung onto the ball and then later returned to the game. That has me taking my hat off to him. However, I don't support his antics as of right now, but everybody's gotta make business decisions. EternalEnigma21 08-08-2006, 11:32 PM I don't think we're number one, but I definately dont think TO and Glenn could be put in a category above us. If they're basing on numbers they should combine TO and glenns numbers last year... dont add up to much... Pure numbers could be the only explaination for not mentioning Moss and Lloyd together... and Lloyd's starting QB for most of last year finished with like 1 td and 11 ints... right?? F the naysayers... our offense is loaded and they could put a drunk monkey at QB this year and have him heave balls blindly out there and we'd have at least 2 1000 yard recievers and a 1500 yd rusher.... EternalEnigma21 08-08-2006, 11:33 PM I don't think we're number one, but I definately dont think TO and Glenn could be put in a category above us. If they're basing on numbers they should combine TO and glenns numbers last year... dont add up to much... Pure numbers could be the only explaination for not mentioning Moss and Lloyd together... and Lloyd's starting QB for most of last year finished with like 1 td and 11 ints... right?? F the naysayers... our offense is loaded and they could put a drunk monkey at QB this year and have him heave balls blindly out there and we'd have at least 2 1000 yard recievers and a 1500 yd rusher.... Pocket$ $traight 08-08-2006, 11:37 PM I don't think we're number one, but I definately dont think TO and Glenn could be put in a category above us. If they're basing on numbers they should combine TO and glenns numbers last year... dont add up to much... Pure numbers could be the only explaination for not mentioning Moss and Lloyd together... and Lloyd's starting QB for most of last year finished with like 1 td and 11 ints... right?? F the naysayers... our offense is loaded and they could put a drunk monkey at QB this year and have him heave balls blindly out there and we'd have at least 2 1000 yard recievers and a 1500 yd rusher.... If you are going to judge the numbers accurately you would to project T.O.'s over a whole season. Last year he was on pace to have his best year ever and Glenn had a great year (for him). T.O.'s would have been better than Moss'. Lloyd had no QB, still put up some decent games, but fell way short of Glenn. GTripp0012 08-09-2006, 02:30 AM What about Randy Moss and Jerry Porter in Oakland?Porter has a weird situation. He hasnt produced and he is unhappy with his role. The potential there, but I wouldn't put the Raiders in the top ten since Porter isn't helping his team. SmootSmack 08-09-2006, 02:38 AM One to watch out for this year could be Andre Johnson and Eric Moulds. I think Carr will really step it up under Kubiak this year and he's got two good receivers to help him. saden1 08-09-2006, 02:58 AM What about Randy Moss and Jerry Porter in Oakland? Porter wants out of of Oakland, plus he is way up there in age. Lets not get ahead of ourselves folks. We Brandon Lloyd as our #2 which isn't saying a lot. Keyshawn is prove even though he whine quite a bit. As for Dallas, Glen is certainly better than our #2, well, a surer player anyways. SmootSmack 08-09-2006, 03:02 AM Porter wants out of of Oakland, plus he is way up there in age. Lets not get ahead of ourselves folks. We Brandon Lloyd as our #2 which isn't saying a lot. Keyshawn is prove even though he whine quite a bit. As for Dallas, Glen is certainly better than our #2, well, a surer player anyways. Porter just turned 28. That's not all that old. Plus he wanted out of Oakland last year too and he still put decent numbers. Granted, he's done better. SmootSmack 08-09-2006, 03:03 AM Porter wants out of of Oakland, plus he is way up there in age. Lets not get ahead of ourselves folks. We Brandon Lloyd as our #2 which isn't saying a lot. Keyshawn is prove even though he whine quite a bit. As for Dallas, Glen is certainly better than our #2, well, a surer player anyways. Porter just turned 28. That's not all that old. Plus he wanted out of Oakland last year too and he still put decent numbers. Granted, he's done better (in terms of yards and touchdowns) |
|
EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum