Rhaamses
08-02-2006, 07:49 PM
Does the OL really concern people??
If we want to talk depth, sure, that's always a concern. What team doesn't have depth concerns along the OL, especially if one of their stars goes down.
But if we're talking about our starting five, I have no worries with this group whatsoever.
Let me tell you why the OL concerns me. Initially, I cannot remember a successful Redskin season that did not have dominant offensive line play. Band-aids held the OL together last year due to injuries. I think Casey Rabach, and Ray Brown proved to be the move valuable thoughout the year. I cannot remember seeing a guy at Ray's age play the line at the level he did. Hell this guy was a former Scab player. His back up sucks, that is why we signed Rabach. I am not looking for Grimm, Bostic and Jacoby. I just want to feel that we can pass protect and run block at a high level in this new offense. Brunell might not have 5 good licks left in that leg.
Is is true that Jensen look smaller than last year?
If we want to talk depth, sure, that's always a concern. What team doesn't have depth concerns along the OL, especially if one of their stars goes down.
But if we're talking about our starting five, I have no worries with this group whatsoever.
Let me tell you why the OL concerns me. Initially, I cannot remember a successful Redskin season that did not have dominant offensive line play. Band-aids held the OL together last year due to injuries. I think Casey Rabach, and Ray Brown proved to be the move valuable thoughout the year. I cannot remember seeing a guy at Ray's age play the line at the level he did. Hell this guy was a former Scab player. His back up sucks, that is why we signed Rabach. I am not looking for Grimm, Bostic and Jacoby. I just want to feel that we can pass protect and run block at a high level in this new offense. Brunell might not have 5 good licks left in that leg.
Is is true that Jensen look smaller than last year?