Redskins in bed with ticket scalpers?

Pages : 1 2 3 4 [5] 6

Hail2theskins
07-25-2006, 06:01 PM
hahaha

i was hoping the mood would lighten, political debates never end well or end period...

That Guy
07-25-2006, 08:15 PM
TV networks pay the NFL to put it on so that does not cost the team anything. Same with concessions. As for stadiums they cost the taxpayer money, not the teams.

sorry, wrong. synder/cook paid for this stadium in full. In fact, synder still owes about 350$million on it... how the **** is that free? concessions definately cost the team money, the fact that they make it back doesn't mean otherwise.

irish
07-26-2006, 07:58 AM
The Squire was likely the last owner to build himself a stadium. In most other places, like Pittsburgh, the taxpayer got the bill. As for concessions, the team in most cases gets all the revenue without the risk because the stadium authority contracts with the supplier. Same for parking. Pretty sweet deal if you ask me.

irish
07-26-2006, 08:00 AM
i realize all of this i was just saying i wish it was different which goes into where our values have gone to in this country, such as someone catching a football is paid more than the leader of the free worldbut im really not going to get into all that, i understand how business works in our economy, i was simply saying that i believe professional athletes are tremondously overpaid for what they do, and i dont buy the "they can only play for so long" crap so many of them dish out because everyone of them could have obtained a college degree virtually free of charge due to their athletic ability and still come out better off than a lot of people in the world...


This has been true since the dawn of civilization. In Rome, a top gladiator was paid 15 times more than a typical Roman citizen. Screwed up then and still screwed up today.

That Guy
07-26-2006, 08:15 AM
This has been true since the dawn of civilization. In Rome, a top gladiator was paid 15 times more than a typical Roman citizen. Screwed up then and still screwed up today.

and a single loss resulted in death. considering that, it's kind of hard to argue or draw parallels.

irish
07-26-2006, 09:21 AM
and a single loss resulted in death. considering that, it's kind of hard to argue or draw parallels.

Its easy to parallel, gladiators were the athletes of their time like our athletes today. Both making lots of $. Fights to the death were rather uncommon (despite what hollywood shows) because popular gladiators were stars that fans wanted to see again.

That Guy
07-26-2006, 09:25 AM
Its easy to parallel, gladiators were the athletes of their time like our athletes today. Both making lots of $. Fights to the death were rather uncommon (despite what hollywood shows) because popular gladiators were stars that fans wanted to see again.

how many pro athletes risk death based on the whims of king/emperor/etc?

last i check the answer was none. a lot of those fighting in arenas were also slaves. How many slaves our on your team's MLB roster? it's not nearly the same.

TheMalcolmConnection
07-26-2006, 09:28 AM
Wow, totally came in at the end of this one! LOL

724Skinsfan
07-26-2006, 09:44 AM
Where am I?

irish
07-26-2006, 09:50 AM
how many pro athletes risk death based on the whims of king/emperor/etc?

last i check the answer was none. a lot of those fighting in arenas were also slaves. How many slaves our on your team's MLB roster? it's not nearly the same.


I dont think I said its the same, at least I dont see a post where I did. All I said was athletes in Roman times were paid a lot more than regular people and athletes in our time are paid a lot more than regular people. Top athletes have always been paid more than regular people.

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum