Patten to be released?

Pages : 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14

gibbsisgod
06-27-2006, 09:09 PM
this is bull, people were positive he was gonna be cut earlier, deadline came, nothing happened...whatever we will see, i still do not think he is gonna be cut...Moss, AR-E, Lloyd, Patten, and Thrash.....im shaving my eyebrows if jacobs stays on the list and patten gets the boot.if that happens we want before and after pics

offiss
06-27-2006, 10:37 PM
everyone just step back and take a deep breath, think about what is being said here. a proven professional in david patten or taylor jacobs. that bum has been hurt so often no one in these parts even knows if he can play at this level. bye bye to jacobs


It's funny but wasen't Patton considered a bum when he was released by the Giant's?

The fact is circumstances sometimes dictate a players success, there have been plenty of players who were given up on be thier first team for one reason or another, only to go on and have fabulous careers, some hall of fame careers, just because Jacobs hasen't had succees yet doesn't mean he won't, I am very curious to see how he performs in a Saunders offense? And yes he's a better special teams player than Patton.

I don't see the need to carry Patton as a 4th WR, better to let him seek significant playing time else where, personally I believe all our WR's are going to really flourish under Saunders, which means who makes the most sense? Like it or not it just may be Jacobs whom does a good job on specials.

Gmanc711
06-27-2006, 10:57 PM
Patten played for the Patriots prior to coming to Washington.

The fact of the matter is Patten is better than probaboly both Thrash and Jacobs...why would get rid of someone who is a better player than another person? Pattne has stated that he is more than happy to compete for playing time, so that tells me that if he's not the best, he dosent mind not playing, or will work hard to see that time. Jacobs is a freaking joke, how that guy even stayed on this long is amazing to me, its time to cut our losses with him and move on.

juanpickett
06-27-2006, 11:24 PM
We need the depth. We need Patten. Remember last season. No depth = Taylor Jacobs starting = no points. Cut Jacobs!

Longtimefan
06-28-2006, 12:08 AM
The only thing I can see going for Jacobs is that he plays special teams, and on a Gibbs team the 4th WR plays teams. Remember McCants?

Whatever happens I'll trust the decision.


I have been saying that all along Matty about DP. As much as many of us (including me) would like to see him stick around for depth, the question with him becomes"What is he going to do on sundays'"? Being the #4 receiver, coupled with his salry he would have to play ST in order to warrant a roster spot. Since he does not play ST is it worth it to the team to keep him around maybe to catch a few balls as the #4 receiver.

GTripp0012
06-28-2006, 02:37 AM
It's all been said aleady. Patten is the better player. It won't surprise me if he gets cut tho, hes a spare part at this point.

dmek25
06-28-2006, 05:06 AM
juan welcome to warpath

Oakland Red
06-28-2006, 05:16 AM
It would be a critical mistake to release Patten. We need him for depth, and also to keep people from getting at all complacent.

Taylor Jacobs has had his opportunites here in my view. He has the talent, but he has to go somewhere else to realize it. We don't have the time to wait for him to develop anymore.

Hog1
06-28-2006, 05:38 AM
i cant get 980 at home. have they said anything else on this matter?

until i read it on skins.com or here on the news wire i will assume that its a false rumor

If it suits you, you can listen on-line. I get it in SW Florida. Below is the link. Hit the drop down under "listen", select "listen live". It will take you to a sign in, and...........................

http://www.sportstalk980.com/main.html

Luxorreb
06-28-2006, 07:06 AM
I'm thinking this is bs speculation and think you'll see Patten in Redskins gear on opening day...

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum