BigSKINBauer
05-30-2006, 03:06 AM
When did we start carrying about peter king's opinions? I think the division right now interms of field talent is
1. Giants
2. Skins
3. Cowboys
4. Eagles
THe giants very well could be in great position to win the division but I hope that the far superior coaching staff can stop that. Also they play last year's 1 and 2 seeds teams in the NFC, so lets hope their tougher schedule helps the rest of us out. The cowboys o-line was bad last year and will be worse this year with the pass rush in this division. The Giants front 7 are going to dominate that game by themselves.
That Guy
05-30-2006, 05:00 AM
giants front 7 only has great DEs... the DTs and LBs and decent, but not amazing. and their secondary has great depth, but the starters are still second rate.
BigSKINBauer
05-30-2006, 06:59 AM
giants front 7 only has great DEs... the DTs and LBs and decent, but not amazing. and their secondary has great depth, but the starters are still second rate.
you took my mini-golf title. I took it back.
Their secondary sucks but it still isn't going to matter because that front 7 is going to be good. THeir DTs suck but that will effect the run more than anything. I don't know how anyone is going to stop osi/strahan and lavar off the side with pierce holding the middle. Their DEs do enough themselves and Lavar brings enough to make his side unstopable. Also with the us adding carter, who i think will be a top 10 DE, the cowboys need a great line to compete and that is going to destroy them. It all starts on the line.
Giantone
05-30-2006, 08:11 AM
Okay, Okay, Okay!
First off, I haven't re-mortgaged my house to get those early odds on Dallas winning the Super Bowl.
Even Peter King says that he picked Minnesota - MINNESOTA!?!?!? - and New England last year. In reality his choice probably dooms the Cowboys to an 8-8 season.
But he does bring up some good points -
1) The NFC EAST is the toughest division in Football.
2) The Cowboys have - on paper mind you - shored up their weak spots from last year. WR, Kicking, Bookend Strong side LB for Ware, Two TE offense (threat on both sides),
3) Notes that the Oline MUST perform better than last year. ( It couldn't be worse really)
4) I really don't care who comes out of the AFC. I hate the AFC. San Diego, Buffalo, Cleveland - I hate all those crappy AFC teams.
P.S. I have been wondering this offseason what the reason is for all the personnel changes in Washington. You guys did well last year and were a sloppy performance in Seattle away from going to the NFC Championship and maybe the Super Bowl.
Why so much upheaval?
1) He's right on that point !
2)Every team on paper has fixed their problems ,that's just stupid.
3) .......duh....and he gets paid for this .
4) AFC .Seahawks,or even Cleveland or Denver .
TheMalcolmConnection
05-30-2006, 09:43 AM
I thought the Seahawks were NFC?
That Guy
05-30-2006, 10:04 AM
seahawks have been nfc for a while now, time to update ;)
RedskinRat
05-30-2006, 01:17 PM
The only way the Giants take the Div again this season is if they get spotted another extra home game.
ArtMonkDrillz
05-30-2006, 01:40 PM
Let's forget about the NFC for a second; did he say how the Pats are getting to the SB? Did they improve at all from last year? I feel like they probably got worse, but they have to known to prove everyone wrong in the past. I jsut don't see why ppl listen to this idiot, which it why I refuse to read the article, which is also why I don't know how he claims that NE can win the AFC.
ArtMonkDrillz
05-30-2006, 01:44 PM
Broncos finish 4th in the division.
I don't know, there's something about that Jake Plummer/Ron Dayne combination that doesn't scare me.
Tatum Bell is no joke. Is it possible that Plummer actually will feel some pressure from Jay Cutler and starts to play consistantly well, or will we get to see another left handed pass?
Giantone
05-30-2006, 01:47 PM
I thought the Seahawks were NFC?
Opps ,brain fart !