MTK
05-24-2006, 12:41 PM
Given Patten's age and contract, I wouldn't say he's a sure lock to make the roster, that's all I'm saying.
Will T. Jacobs Be Cut ?MTK 05-24-2006, 12:41 PM Given Patten's age and contract, I wouldn't say he's a sure lock to make the roster, that's all I'm saying. dblanch66 05-24-2006, 12:46 PM Gone. How many lives does this guy have? He may be a nice guy, but nice don't catch, score or block. He has had every opportunity to step up and has done jack. Plus, the guy gets hurt just walking. Cut our losses and let an undrafted rookie take his spot. Maybe we'll find someone who actually wants to play. FRPLG 05-24-2006, 12:58 PM I would be stunned at this point if Patten gets cut over Jacobs. Jacobs hasn't done squat in the league. At least Patten has some rings and experience. ArtMonkDrillz 05-24-2006, 01:05 PM What about Thrash, does he get cut over either or is he pretty well secure in the #4 spot? jamf 05-24-2006, 01:32 PM Thrash has value as a special teamer. The only reason i think patten will get cut is im predicting he will start bitching about being #4 on the depth chart. He will want to play a larger role. EXoffender 05-24-2006, 02:18 PM Take out the Thrash. scowan 05-24-2006, 02:47 PM Thrash won't get cut ahead of Jacobs either. For the same resaons I mentioned about Patten.... experience, leadership, cap friendly salary, special teams gunner. ect. ect. If you think about it, we were really thin at WR at the end of the year. Patton and Thrash both got hurt and we had to resort to Farris. gibbsisgod 05-24-2006, 03:03 PM i think saunders will push to have 6 wrs on the active roster That Guy 05-24-2006, 03:07 PM patten >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jacobs. patten is safe. jacobs has a high chance of being cut unless we keep 6 wrs. 724Skinsfan 05-24-2006, 03:10 PM After hearing so many people compliment him and his potential over the last three years I hate to cut him. Not that it's my job to do so. |
|
EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum