Brunell in Saunders's offense ?

how ironic, eh? :P this was dead last night, yet you felt the need to respond specifically to my post with retread information you already posted 3 times for some reason. so, i'm sorry (actually i'm not) but i'd have to disagree with you yet again.

see post #105. Yes I agree, that too is ironic.

whats so magical about post 105? i already saw it and responded, and then you started yet another childish run of pointless posting instead of actually replying to any of the issues i raised.

whatever, have fun, you're pointless.

whats so magical about post 105? i already saw it and responded, and then you started yet another childish run of pointless posting instead of actually replying to any of the issues i raised.

whatever, have fun, you're pointless.

What did you respond to ? Point #1 or #2 ?

This is great!

BTW, I'm only trying to raise my number of posts:)

This is great!

BTW, I'm only trying to raise my number of posts:)

I am too, but I think I may need to stop :)

I am too, but I think I may need to stop :)

I think we all should, and let this thread RIP:)

What did you respond to ? Point #1 or #2 ?

damn, did you even read my response? I said you blantantly misrepresented a quote that you took completely out of context and then decided it should be taken a gospel to top it off.

and are you really saying stats are worthless? is this huddle's new screen name? they magically make sense after watching someone, but are completely void beforehand? come on.

damn, did you even read my response? I saide you blantantly misrepresented a quote that you took completely out of context and then decided it should be taken a gospel on top of that.


I did read your post and it wasn't arguing anything directly in what I posted in #105. I believe him (with what he says his opinion is) when he says Collins is as good a technician there is in this passing game and when he says he hasn't had a chance because of Trent Green.

There's nothing else to it in my mind.

they magically make sense after watching someone, but are completely void beforehand? come on.

If they don't make sense then the stats don't accurately reflect the player's ability.

Do you judge players strictly by their stats before you even watch them play ?

I don't, I reserve judgment until I watch them play - this is just where you and I just differ.

When I reread the posts, it appears repetitious on my part - but all I'm doing is going back to the same points over and over again because that's the 2 main things i'm arguing. It's simple: I believe Saunders and I judge players after I watch them play (and not before).

If you think I shouldn't do the 2 things above then that's your opinion.