724Skinsfan
04-25-2006, 07:06 PM
Everytime I read the title of this thread, I see biggest "TREATS" in the NFC. For me, that would be the Skins cheerleaders.
Now that you've written that I can only see biggest TEATS in the NFC.... and I still agree!
(I hope that wasn't over the line, sorry for any offense)
70Chip
04-25-2006, 07:38 PM
The Giants shouldn't scare anyone. Dallas, Carolina, and Seattle are the only clubs that will be able to hang with the Skins.
JankySpanky80
04-25-2006, 07:44 PM
The Giants shouldn't scare anyone. Dallas, Carolina, and Seattle are the only clubs that will be able to hang with the Skins.
I wish that was easier said than done. This season is gonna be full of battles. The Giants are gonna be able to bring it and don't forget if Mcnabb is healthy the Eagles still won't be a pushover. i hate them with a passion just like the rest of the division, but lets not under estimate our opponents this early. Remember we were picked to win it all in 2000 and finished only a mere 8-8. We already have proven we can hang and we are winners, now we just got to prove we can take the next step and i believe we can do it. Skins-fo-life
81forHOF
04-25-2006, 09:16 PM
Now that you've written that I can only see biggest TEATS in the NFC.... and I still agree!
No, that would be Larry Allen.
GTripp0012
04-25-2006, 10:26 PM
I think the NY Giants will be toughest D to handle this year and the Panthers O will give our D their biggest headache this year. But other than that I think the colts will have the best O we will face this year hands down.
Weak run blocking line, with a rookie runningback or even worse, Dominic Rhodes. By the time week 8 rolls around, no one in the league will respect that rushing game.
Oakland Red
04-25-2006, 11:18 PM
To me the Seattle Seahawks are the team to beat. They won the NFC; they were the best last year. They have probably gained in strength overall in the offseason; they have the experience of playing all the way through the Super Bowl this past year.
To me the Redskins are the top challengers; our improvement has been notable with free agent pickups and our trade. I think the Redskins will win the Super Bowl this year, but the Seahawks definitely are the strongest barrier for us in the NFC in my book.
gibbsisgod
04-26-2006, 05:54 AM
Now that you've written that I can only see biggest TEATS in the NFC.... and I still agree!
(I hope that wasn't over the line, sorry for any offense)mmmmm, teats
724Skinsfan
04-26-2006, 09:13 AM
No, that would be Larry Allen.
:lol: :laughing2
TheMalcolmConnection
04-26-2006, 09:40 AM
To me the Seattle Seahawks are the team to beat. They won the NFC; they were the best last year. They have probably gained in strength overall in the offseason; they have the experience of playing all the way through the Super Bowl this past year.
To me the Redskins are the top challengers; our improvement has been notable with free agent pickups and our trade. I think the Redskins will win the Super Bowl this year, but the Seahawks definitely are the strongest barrier for us in the NFC in my book.
Speaking of them, I have a question. How in the hell did they manage to 1) Sign Alexander to a long term contract 2) Sign Burleson to that STUPID huge contract and 3) Get Peterson?
That Guy
04-26-2006, 10:03 AM
Speaking of them, I have a question. How in the hell did they manage to 1) Sign Alexander to a long term contract 2) Sign Burleson to that STUPID huge contract and 3) Get Peterson?
cause, like the eagles, they have a stupid amount of cap room and good depth. Its what happens when you build through the draft and don't have top 10 picks every year. the burleson deal is only 4mill a year, its only stupid if he stayed in minnesota. peterson is 7mill a year, but if they kept hutchinson, he would have gotten the money instead.
peterson was the stupid contract. they could have offered a lot less and still have been clearly in the lead to get him.