Is there a position we CAN'T draft early?

Pages : 1 2 [3]

mcalderone10
04-12-2006, 03:33 PM
I say use the first pick on the best snapper in all the land. Albright could get hurt and we could use that depth.

great idea

TheMalcolmConnection
04-12-2006, 03:34 PM
Yes, I know. I'm smart like that.

GTripp0012
04-12-2006, 07:02 PM
I voted for QB, RB, WR, CB, S, K, P, and moderator. All the others need an injecton of youth, so take the player who's talents would be best used by the B & G then by any other team.

dmek25
04-12-2006, 07:56 PM
i want to change my vote to moderator.after thinking about it,we have a bunch of 2's and 3's,but no clearcut #1.plus we are getting old in a hurry at that position

That Guy
04-12-2006, 10:47 PM
i want to change my vote to moderator.after thinking about it,we have a bunch of 2's and 3's,but no clearcut #1.plus we are getting old in a hurry at that position

yeah, and that matty guy has such a badattude... i mean, i thought I had ego problems, but man...

SmootSmack
04-12-2006, 11:10 PM
This kind of reminds me of last year when a lot of us said "Wait, we already have Brunell and Ramsey. Why did we spend a first on another quarterback?"

Of course, I don't think people were necessarily bothered by spending the first on a QB, but the fact that we traded up to get that first"

mcalderone10
04-13-2006, 12:42 AM
This kind of reminds me of last year when a lot of us said "Wait, we already have Brunell and Ramsey. Why did we spend a first on another quarterback?"

Of course, I don't think people were necessarily bothered by spending the first on a QB, but the fact that we traded up to get that first"

yea but who's going to say Joe Gibbs did something wrong? Damn sure aint goin to be me.

Monkeydad
04-13-2006, 12:16 PM
WR, then RB, then QB.

We should get more secondary players, maybe a LB and a kicker.

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum