2006 Predictions

I honestly and truly could see the Skins going undefeated. All the pieces are in place and if Brunell plays his game all year, I could definitely see it.

I know that's a bold prediction, but I could easily see it. Of course "Any Given Sunday" applies here, but the Skins most definitely have the talent to do it.
The problem I see with this is not that we couldn't start 13-0 or 14-0, but once we get to that point, we would start resting our starters and protecting them from injury.

This is what I view as the biggest roadblock

14-2. We sweep our division. The difference this time is our receiving corps. The Giants don't win win this year.

Just did the ESPN Sportsnation poll for the Redskins season. Turns out I think the Skins are going 12-4

http://sports.espn.go.com/chat/sportsnation/story?page=2006nflschedule

I see us losing two or 3 games in the division this year; however, we sweep the AFC games.

12-4 or 13-3

12-4

I can see us winning all the games, the panthers and the falcons are the only foes who matches well agianst us

he he he we can beat dallas any week
especially with our cowboys killer wr in santana and brandon, and the
explosive return game of randle el

Here's something funny. Last night I stoped for a drink and caught the last hour of the Masters. A guy had the NFL sechedule and I herd a guy say the skins won't be a factor they don't have a QB and they think Randal El is such a great player. I asked the guy who his team was and he stated the Eagles and then braged about owning the division for the past four years. I then asked him where did that get them and how many SB's have they won? he did not have much of an answer. Then I said Randal was just a part of our team and his signing was alot better then them resigning McCants. He then said McCants played great for them last year. I could only laugh and told him they cut him during the year and he only had a few catches and did not even get over 200 yards. He said that can't be right and we made a bet on it. I then asked him who was going to be their RB and WR for their great QB to throw to and all he could do was come up with Wetbrook and McCants. I then said you know McCants played three years for the skins and if the Eagles are counting on him they are going to have a long season.

After careful study of the very top football experts in the industry including Shawn Salisbury, Peter King, Lenny P, Dr. Z and Don Banks I think that we have a good shot at 0-16. I'll go with 1-15 because those guys can't always be right can they?

Here's something funny. Last night I stoped for a drink and caught the last hour of the Masters. A guy had the NFL sechedule and I herd a guy say the skins won't be a factor they don't have a QB and they think Randal El is such a great player. I asked the guy who his team was and he stated the Eagles and then braged about owning the division for the past four years. I then asked him where did that get them and how many SB's have they won? he did not have much of an answer. Then I said Randal was just a part of our team and his signing was alot better then them resigning McCants. He then said McCants played great for them last year. I could only laugh and told him they cut him during the year and he only had a few catches and did not even get over 200 yards. He said that can't be right and we made a bet on it. I then asked him who was going to be their RB and WR for their great QB to throw to and all he could do was come up with Wetbrook and McCants. I then said you know McCants played three years for the skins and if the Eagles are counting on him they are going to have a long season.

how's Salisbury doing anyway?
11-5, I like Tafkas can see them undefeated. However............maybe ...............I'm ......biased. I figure they drop a couple to division foes (not the girls) Indy, and a couple of stumbles along the way. I really think the team made solid if not prophetic changes in FA. The only wild card in my mind is QB. Does Brunell have it, to make full use of the recieving core? I think so.