SmootSmack
04-05-2006, 08:31 PM
more important stuff,who sponsered the poll?
An anonymous donor sponsored it. He asked that his name not be released. I won't give away his name but it rhymes with Tammy Law Van
GTripp0012
04-05-2006, 10:08 PM
I know we are a Skins fourm, but 32-0??? That's crazy
RobH4413
04-05-2006, 10:53 PM
I nominate "the war path" to serve as fill-in jury. I mean, we would definitly be un-biased right?
http://img206.imageshack.us/img206/7360/taylor6kt.gif
hahaha. good ol' microsoft paint and 3 min.
EXoffender
04-07-2006, 03:20 PM
He will be suspended by the team and possibly the league though.
some people here are really retarded
Sheriff Gonna Getcha
04-07-2006, 07:00 PM
Not to get too legal, but the witness' criminal convictions will likely be admissible.
A witness' criminal convictions actually get admitted most of the time. In federal court, which admittedly has slightly different rules of evidence than Florida, a witness' criminal convictions are relevant for the purpose of showing character for truthfulness. Only when the prejudice of introducing such evidence substantially outweighs its probative value (of showing character for truthfulness) will the evidence of the conviction be denied admission. While courts don't want "bad person prejudice" to infect a trial, in federal court, there is a presumption that criminal convictions carry significant probative impeachment value.
Pocket$ $traight
04-07-2006, 07:23 PM
He will be suspended by the team and possibly the league though.
Not if he gets off.
SmootSmack
04-07-2006, 07:42 PM
some people here are really retarded
I would say that's like the pot calling the kettle black...but you'd probably take that in a totally different way
Dirtbag59
04-08-2006, 08:08 PM
Its kind of funny how most of the people responding to this thread have ST avitars.
firstdown
04-11-2006, 03:24 PM
So if the defense can prove that the prosecution was somehow informed of the witnesses' recent arrests, then the case can and should be thrown out. Wow, that would also put the brakes on that prosecutor's political aspirations.To be fair we do not know that the prosecutor has any political aspirations or new that the witnesses had been arrested. With the way our goverment agencies work today ( or don't work for that matter) it would not surprise me he did not know they had other charges against them. They must have something for this case to go to trial but I realy don't know what the standards are.