How Will Campbell Be Handled?

No. I was merely making the case against matty's deceptive stat.

What's deceptive about saying Brunell tossed 4 TDs against Dallas??

A TD throw is a TD throw, whether it comes from 80 yards or 2 yards.

When Manning broke the TD record two years ago, did people complain that he threw a ton of them from inside the 5?

What's deceptive about saying Brunell tossed 4 TDs against Dallas??

A TD throw is a TD throw, whether it comes from 80 yards or 2 yards.

When Manning broke the TD record two years ago, did people complain that he threw a ton of them from inside the 5?

People who had Edgerrin James on their fantasy teams did. :silly: ;)

Well, I don't know. Seeing as to how Tony has played for Gibbs and sat in his locker room. I figured I would listen to what he had to say.

And then there's this (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/12/20/AR2005122001424.html)

Gibbs is quick to point out that the ratio of running plays to passing plays is often predicated on game situations, with the score being the chief consideration. The Redskins trailed often in the first 10 games -- "I think you're going to get more runs when you have a lead," Gibbs said.

"Joe Gibbs wants his team to be physical," Williams said, "and you know what, every single meeting that Joe has in front of this team he talks about how we're going to win these physical battles. 'I don't care what else happens in this ballgame, we're going to be physical.' And it's nice to see us playing that way, especially at the end of the season. That's when it's time to be that way. Not to say it's not important all the time, but to be more and more and more and more physical as the year goes on, that's good."

The question we're discussing is whether Gibbs relied heavily on the running game at the end of last year because he wanted to as a matter of philosophy or whether he was forced to by circumstance.

There is nothing in the past, in Gibbs 1.0 or in Gibbs 2004, to suggest that he has typically relied on the running game so heavily to close out a season.

His strategy has always been to use the power running game to set up the pass. There's no change there.

He has always run the football more when he has a lead. There's no change there.

But he has referred to balance between running and passing as his aim three or four times this year...including late last year when he added a "but" to his statement before explaining his shift to relying more on the running game.

I challenge you to dig further in your research and target the agressors, those who take perfectly good threads and turn them into harsh personal exchanges.


Yah, like those people who call into question the ability of other members to ever make sound logical arguments simply because that member makes the suggestion that the other person may have actually been wrong........hey wait a minute.......

Sorry, I just couldn't resist. :joke: I have a tendency to :bdh:

Huddle, when was the last successful QB platoon that resulted in a playoff and or Super Bowl appearance??

That Kilmer/Jurgensen platoon worked pretty good!

(This thread needs some levity!)

How funny is THIS (http://www.thewarpath.net/showthread.php?t=11837)?

How funny is THIS (http://www.thewarpath.net/showthread.php?t=11837)?

I was waiting for someone to post this. LOL

How funny is THIS (http://www.thewarpath.net/showthread.php?t=11837)?

I wondering if Gibbs plans on platooning him into the #2 spot instead??

How funny is THIS (http://www.thewarpath.net/showthread.php?t=11837)?Again matty, thats irrelevant:cheeky-sm

How funny is THIS (http://www.thewarpath.net/showthread.php?t=11837)?

:laughing2 I'm dying here. LOL!

I guess this begs the question: Should we be platooning Todd Collins in with Brunell? LOL