How Will Campbell Be Handled?

I'm willing to agree to disagree at this point. How about you?

Agreed

Selected?

I gave you his stats for every game after the SF game.

Your take that the passing game "tanked" after the SF game just doesn't hold water, no matter what way you look at the stats.

My post is a good example of using stats to back up your stance, rather than just throwing an opinion out there that isn't justified by the numbers.

But Matty you don't know about the stats that only a secret set of people know about. You're on the outside looking in so you can't know about such stats.

This would have to be during garbage time, in my opinion. What is the advantage of bringing in Campbell during a close game to play a series or two? Especially when, as has been pointed out here, we're knocking on the Super Bowl door.

I think this will all be a lot clearer come mid-August once we've seen both play.

There's not enough garbage time in the NFL to prepare a young QB. Last year, that would have amounted to about three quarters of play. Thanks to parity, most of the games are close.

If we could reasonably expect Brunell to perform well enough over an entire season for a championship run, I wouldn't have drawn the conclusion that we need to get Campbell ready and hope that he's up to the challenge.

I'm setting the line at 17 more posts before this thread gets locked if the infamous "statistics" argument gets opened up again. Who's got the over, who's got the under?

I'm setting the line at 17 more posts before this thread gets locked if the infamous "statistics" argument gets opened up again. Who's got the over, who's got the under?

Naw....I think you're right on PSU.

I saw it coming....

Your post is a good example of how selected stats can be used to support any position.

:confused:

:confused:

Just another way for him to cop-out and say, irrelevant.

Here's a stat for you. Huddle has started 12 threads since joining us. And 4 have been locked. With quite possibly a 5th on the way.

That has to be some sort of record.

Here's a stat for you. Huddle has started 12 threads since joining us. And 4 have been locked. With quite possibly a 5th on the way.

That has to be some sort of record.

But there are too many variables that you're not taking into account in your statistics.......so they're irrelevant.

Here's a stat for you. Huddle has started 12 threads since joining us. And 4 have been locked. With quite possibly a 5th on the way.

That has to be some sort of record.that is an irrelevant stat