Payback: Seahawks signed Burlseson from Vikes

Pages : 1 2 [3]

Pocket$ $traight
03-25-2006, 12:16 PM
man,you want to talk about overpaying?burleson is a fine player,but we actually over payed alittle but 49 million,wow

I am guessing that the contract is back loaded. The 49 million number was used in spite. Also, only 5.25 is guaranteed which is really what matters. They could drop him after a year or two and it wouldn't hurt that bad.

TheMalcolmConnection
03-25-2006, 01:17 PM
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=2383020

Oh man what a great tactic! wtf why didnt dannyboy think of this first?

He did. We signed all the people that the Bears wanted. :)

It's called keep-away.

Pocket$ $traight
03-25-2006, 01:33 PM
He did. We signed all the people that the Bears wanted. :)

It's called keep-away.

There were no poison pills in those deals.

TheMalcolmConnection
03-25-2006, 01:36 PM
Well, if that really is the case. Good for the Seahawks. Let your pride and egos get in the way of what's good for your team.

amorentz
03-25-2006, 01:43 PM
True. But how much will he actually see of that 49 million. I'm not sure of all the details of the contract.

In reality it is a 4 year $14.4m contract with $3.5m signing bonus. The last three years are just dummy years to make the guaranteed contract too unwieldy to match.

GTripp0012
03-25-2006, 05:30 PM
cause then we'd have to give the 49ers a 1st rounder, which we don't have, so we couldn't have made a deal in the first place.
Good point.

Dirtbag59
03-25-2006, 08:14 PM
Wait how does anyone consider this payback. First the Vikings take away half of the reason that the Seahawks were so effective running left then the Seahawks overpay a reciever the Vikings didn't want anymore. If anything the Vikings just hit the Seahawks with a nice one-two punch

GTripp0012
03-25-2006, 08:19 PM
Wait how does anyone consider this payback. First the Vikings take away half of the reason that the Seahawks were so effective running left then the Seahawks overpay a reciever the Vikings didn't want anymore. If anything the Vikings just hit the Seahawks with a nice one-two punch

Yeah, but ya know, at least the Hawks proved that they won't be outdicked by anyone.

Pocket$ $traight
03-25-2006, 10:45 PM
Wait how does anyone consider this payback. First the Vikings take away half of the reason that the Seahawks were so effective running left then the Seahawks overpay a reciever the Vikings didn't want anymore. If anything the Vikings just hit the Seahawks with a nice one-two punch

They didn't overpay and it was the Vikings #1 guy. You don't think that hurt them? Now they are a K-Rob cocktail away from Marcus Robinson being the go to guy.

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum