whos the starting positions at receiver?

Pages : [1] 2 3 4 5

jordanz301
03-20-2006, 11:00 AM
who do you see being our starting receivers?.....i think we can all agree on santana moss being the number one but what about #2 #3 and #4. we have four i think really capable receivers making a big impact for the skins. so whos gnna bbe the ones to line up as the receivers and why.

my picks
#1- santana moss- hands down super explosive and great playmaker ability and great adjustment to terrible balls thrown by brunell.
#2-Brandon Lloyd- this guy definitley has playmaker ability i cant wait to watch him make spectacular grabs. i hope he doesnt become a distraction in the locker room.
#3-david patten- even though everyone likes randle el, including me, i dont think hes better than david patten. david has speed, has good route running ability and i think he truley didnt get a fair shot. i think hes hungry to prove everyone wrong and feels disrespected with the skins bringin in two more receivers. i really think he has ability to be #2 receiver but the coaching staff would never put him there after putting all that money to lloyd and antwaan
#4 randle el- great player on special teams great character and great all around athlete. i dont think he has enough ability as strictly receiver to be better than patten or Lloyd. i would love to see him in trick plays screen plays and especially returning the ball on special teams. i think thats where he makes most of his impact.

PWNED
03-20-2006, 11:04 AM
i really dont think there will be a clear cut #1 unless its by title only. i think there will be sets with each receiver as the featured player. i think moss will be featured more than the others, but i think after moss, everyone is a #2.

MTK
03-20-2006, 11:05 AM
1. Moss
2. Randle El
3. Lloyd
4. Patten
5. Thrash

Randle El and Lloyd will be interchangeable at the #2, since we should be running alot of 3 WR sets I don't think there will be a big difference between the two. Randle El should handle more of the slot duties and Lloyd will probably play more wide.

#56fanatic
03-20-2006, 11:19 AM
Moss, Lloyd, Randel El / Patten. Tharsh will be mostly special teamer. I think Randel El will be the 3rd, you cant pay a guy 30 million to be a number four. Really, I dont see how you can pay him to be a 3, but I think Lloyd is the better true WR.

Paintrain
03-20-2006, 11:20 AM
I think Randle-El is better suited as a slot receiver but will probably get the number of touches that are indicative of a #2 WR.. Lloyd is more effective working from the outside in and on jump balls since he isn't as quick and elusive as Randle-El.. Since we are going to do predominantly 3 WR then Moss, Lloyd and Randle-El will all be starters..

1-Moss
2-Lloyd
2A-Randle-El
4-Patten

D'BOYZ
03-20-2006, 11:32 AM
Moss, Lloyd, Randel El / Patten. Tharsh will be mostly special teamer. I think Randel El will be the 3rd, you cant pay a guy 30 million to be a number four. Really, I dont see how you can pay him to be a 3, but I think Lloyd is the better true WR.

exactly Patten is the number 4 and Lloyd will be the number 2 because he is more of a posesion receiver than randal and in 2 receiver set that yo udon't use that much you need someone who can get the tough yards. Randal is more of the slot receiver type.

skinsttw
03-20-2006, 11:47 AM
What about my man Taylor Jacobs?

MTK
03-20-2006, 12:03 PM
What about my man Taylor Jacobs?

What about him??

Unless he suddenly grows a pair and starts impressing people outside of practice, expect him to hit the waiver wire at some point this offseason.

Redskins8588
03-20-2006, 12:22 PM
What about him??

Unless he suddenly grows a pair and starts impressing people outside of practice, expect him to hit the waiver wire at some point this offseason.
Yeah I agree, atleast Thrash proves himself on special teams and he can fill in if need be at WR (when healthy)...

Skins_4_Lyfe
03-20-2006, 12:23 PM
Moss #1
Lloyd #2
Patten/Randle El/Thrash #3 (depending on package)

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum