Who starts at QB?

i don't think anyone mentioned this, so i thought i'd bring it up...

ramsey was robbed and brunell sucks.

discuss.

As it turned out though, Ramsey was lucky. If Gibbs had started him in 2004, he would have looked as bad as Brunell in that inept offense and his career would have been totally in the toilet. At least he got a chance to show something in the final seven games when the offense began to get its act together.

Funny you mention that, because it's been brought up here before (before you joined) that if Ramsey had been thrown into the fire like that there is the very real possibility that it would have destroyed him. And yet Gibbs chose not to put him through that...but people still want to believe Gibbs has personal vendetta against Ramsey.

Funny you mention that, because it's been brought up here before (before you joined) that if Ramsey had been thrown into the fire like that there is the very real possibility that it would have destroyed him. And yet Gibbs chose not to put him through that...but people still want to believe Gibbs has personal vendetta against Ramsey.

Well, I thought of it when it happened. I was in Ramsey's corner but the handwriting was on the wall in preseason. The offense just wasn't working. Brunell or Ramsey...it wouldn't have made any difference.

I don't know that Joe planned it that way to save Patrick's confidence but it worked in his favor.

Schneed 10, sorry for the delayed response. I didn't see your post until now.

That statement right there is a contender for the Schneed10 smackdown of the day award.

Oh no! Not the dreaded smackdown award!

Some dumbass in Green Bay? Um at the time, that would have been Mike Holmgren. And at the time, he let Brunell go because HE HAD BRETT FAVRE. Who only led the team to a Super Bowl victory, of all things.

Yeah...and if you have two very good quarterbacks on your team the smart thing to do is to trade one?

Jesus H Christ. I can't believe what I'm reading.

You forgot the three exclamation points.

But let's go with the Green Bay comparison for a minute.

Let's not since the rest of your post involves hypotheticals based on the unsupported premise that a team with two good quarterbacks should trade one away.

Schneed 10, sorry for the delayed response. I didn't see your post until now.

That statement right there is a contender for the Schneed10 smackdown of the day award.

Oh no! Not the dreaded smackdown award!

Some dumbass in Green Bay? Um at the time, that would have been Mike Holmgren. And at the time, he let Brunell go because HE HAD BRETT FAVRE. Who only led the team to a Super Bowl victory, of all things.

Yeah...and if you have two very good quarterbacks on your team the smart thing to do is to trade one?

Jesus H Christ. I can't believe what I'm reading.

You forgot the three exclamation points.

But let's go with the Green Bay comparison for a minute.

Let's not since the rest of your post involves hypotheticals based on the unsupported premise that a team with two good quarterbacks should trade one away.

and your posts just assume that for some reason ramsey is great.

i don't think anyone mentioned this, so i thought i'd bring it up...

ramsey was robbed and brunell sucks.

discuss.
Are you trying to be funny!?!? No, seriously I don't get it :benched: :bdh: :bdh: :funnypost :confused:

Are you trying to be funny!?!? No, seriously I don't get it :benched: :bdh: :bdh: :funnypost :confused:

ramsey is gone regardless of whatever's happen, so i have no idea why we're still devoting meaningless 200 post threads to him and if he is or isn't great. He played good in some games and average in more and now he may be a career backup who can't even get us a 5th round pick.

there are still people who swear jeff george can play, I know people get attached to certain players, but its over, he's gone, and its time to move on.

and your posts just assume that for some reason ramsey is great.

Nope.

The Packers got a 3rd and a 5th for Brunell. And I think they used the 3rd on Antonio Freeman. It doesn't hurt to have two good young QBs as the Packers had with Favre and Brunell.

But it also doesn't hurt to be able to use one to make your team better overall as the Packers were able to do by trading Brunell.

Can someone plllleeeaaaassssseeee tell me whether we would save money if we cut Brunell? ;)