Does Lloyd's "attitude" bother anyone?

Even when we had that awesome Gibbs team from 1991-92, two stars (Gary Clark and Wilber Marshall) were occasionally known for opening their mouths too much. If Lloyd's biggest problem is that he said T.O. was bad for S.F., I don't think he'll be a huge problem for the team. Glad we added some young talent to the team (also glad we re-signed Rock and released Raymer, Bowen, and Tupa). Sad to see Harris go since he was a good nickelback, but his contract would've been too much.
Lloyd is a bit of a hothead but so is Mike Nolan. Remember how he treated Jamie Winborn, trading him to Jacksonville. I watched Lloyd a lot this year and he's pretty good, certainly worth the draft picks we gave up if he can buy into the team first concept. He's no smurf and will make CBs respect his abilities. He caught 4 TDs from Rattay and Alex Smith was horrible last year, so his numbers should top 1000 yards if he starts, or at least 800 as a 3rd wideout. A good addition and Randel El would be another fine piece to add to the puzzle, but Lloyd makes us better....

I say we start him, he has so much potential and making him number 3 would only hold that back. And like alot of other people have said, I have faith in Gibbs dealing with this "attitude" or whatever.

basically right now we have a #1, #1.5, #2.5, #4 (thrash), #6 (brown), and #2000 (take wild guess here) WR on the roster. randle would be a #2.5, but he's really better as a #3.

if we get randle i don't know how you'd keep them all happy though. moss wouldn't care and talent wise, you have a clear #2... patten and randle are both very good #3s though and we simply have not run 4 WR sets here, and we don't use many 3 WR sets either.

basically right now we have a #1, #1.5, #2.5, #4 (thrash), #6 (brown), and #2000 (take wild guess here) WR on the roster. randle would be a #2.5, but he's really better as a #3.

if we get randle i don't know how you'd keep them all happy though. moss wouldn't care and talent wise, you have a clear #2... patten and randle are both very good #3s though and we simply have not run 4 WR sets here, and we don't use many 3 WR sets either.

Exactly. We'd be better off with Cooley, Moss, Lloyd, and Randle El on the Field than Patten instead of Cooley. BTW I like the numbering system. Puts things in perspective for morons like me.