We will draft a DB with our first pick. [Archive] - Page 2


	Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum > We will draft a DB with our first pick. PDA We will draft a DB with our first pick. Pages : 1 [2] 3 That Guy 03-09-2006, 12:46 PM if pope is available, you gotta draft him ;) otherwise i still like OL or some of the LBs more than the CBs there... but there are good cbs. and i would be pretty pissed if we took stovall at 53. one good season and he's SLOW. bjschmonsees 03-09-2006, 01:08 PM Many of us are already discounting Springs, but I think he has a very good season ahead of him. Could be wrong, but that's just my gut feeling. Also, if his speed starts to decline, have him put 15 pounds on and he might make a nice strong safety. I'm just not sure if he's strong enough? thoughts? Who is discounting Springs? I think he is in our top 5 defender list... bigm29 03-09-2006, 01:32 PM our main problem is depth. we dont need any big name free agents, except maybe a replacement for arrington and maybe for Royal also. I really think patten can be our number 2, he really hasnt had a chance yet because of his injury. What we need is solid recievers to play under him and moss, cuz we dont want to insert thrash or jacobs if there is an injury. Build through the draft!!!! Monksdown 03-09-2006, 01:39 PM Originally Posted by dan_snyder69 Many of us are already discounting Springs, but I think he has a very good season ahead of him. Could be wrong, but that's just my gut feeling. Also, if his speed starts to decline, have him put 15 pounds on and he might make a nice strong safety. I'm just not sure if he's strong enough? thoughts? I disagree with nearly every comment you had about Shawn. No offense. huntz 03-09-2006, 01:48 PM [QUOTE=That Guy]if pope is available, you gotta draft him ;) otherwise i still like OL or some of the LBs more than the CBs there... but there are good cbs. and i would be pretty pissed if we took stovall at 53. one good season and he's SLOW.[/QUOTYA Ya think Pope will be there at 53? And that's the knock on Stovall, plus he's not great at seperation. That's until last season. Maybe he'll end up in Philly. He's from that area. That Guy 03-09-2006, 01:58 PM [QUOTE=That Guy]if pope is available, you gotta draft him ;) otherwise i still like OL or some of the LBs more than the CBs there... but there are good cbs. and i would be pretty pissed if we took stovall at 53. one good season and he's SLOW.[/QUOTYA Ya think Pope will be there at 53? And that's the knock on Stovall, plus he's not great at seperation. That's until last season. Maybe he'll end up in Philly. He's from that area. honestly? no. but if he did fall and we took stovall instead, that'd be an act of war. PWNED 03-09-2006, 01:59 PM whats funny is that it seems like there is only one "cant miss" WR from every draft. pretty mcuh the pundits are always like "well he has THIS positive but THIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIS many negatives" garbage Sheriff Gonna Getcha 03-09-2006, 03:24 PM We'll have a much better idea of who we draft in a few weeks, after we sign FAs and the draft board becomes more clear (after players hold workouts on their home turf). bjschmonsees 03-09-2006, 03:25 PM Agreed, but unless we re-sign Harris and another CB, a CB will be drafted with the first pick! Beemnseven 03-09-2006, 06:17 PM I seriously doubt we will be drafting at TE that high. Maybe a project guy in the later rounds. It's hard to say, but I think Cooley will become more of a true TE, and Sellars will play the FB/HB role in Saunders system. Who knows, I could be completely wrong. No, I think you're exactly right. Of course, a lot of it depends on how much Al Saunders' needs will factor in with this draft. If he convinces Gibbs that a true tight end is absolutely vital to his offense, then you could see it, but with Cooley already here, I doubt that will be the case.