#56fanatic
03-10-2006, 11:05 AM
Thank you for saying what I was unable to say due to an uncontrollable desire to strangle #56fanatic.
#56fanatic, it's not about agreeing with me. It's that your argument flat out made no sense. You said Bruce was too old and on the downside of his career, yet advocated for Moulds even though he's only one year younger. You said Bruce was small, but he's friggin 6 feet tall. It's not about agreeing with me, it's about forming a coherent argument. You come on the board all the time with knowledge that you think is right, and you don't even check your facts. It bothers the heck out of me. And until you stop doing it, I'm going to roundhouse kick you all over these message boards.
blah blah blah. didnt I say I stand corrected with the age thing buddy! And the reason I would go for Moulds is his size. Like I said we have to smaller recievers and need a bigger one. That is not to say I jump all over him because he is a FA. If I had to choose between the two, that is who I would take. And in todays NFL 6ft 180 to 190 is not concidered big, average, not big. Big is 6-2 to 6-4 220. Owens,burress,walker,clayton,curry,muhammed ect. You can disagree like a mature person or an idiot, seems to me you always take the idiot route. Like I said, what fact or research do you want me to do? what facts am I to check. I was a year off with the age. thats something to freak out about! You are truely annoying with your comments when someone has a different point of view. I dont attack people, or say they are incoherent, that is just f***ing stupid. grow up act like a mature adult and let people have their opinions or statements. You make this a totally un enjoyable site with all your bull shit remarks and "I'll roundhouse kick your ass all over this site" please!
#56fanatic, it's not about agreeing with me. It's that your argument flat out made no sense. You said Bruce was too old and on the downside of his career, yet advocated for Moulds even though he's only one year younger. You said Bruce was small, but he's friggin 6 feet tall. It's not about agreeing with me, it's about forming a coherent argument. You come on the board all the time with knowledge that you think is right, and you don't even check your facts. It bothers the heck out of me. And until you stop doing it, I'm going to roundhouse kick you all over these message boards.
blah blah blah. didnt I say I stand corrected with the age thing buddy! And the reason I would go for Moulds is his size. Like I said we have to smaller recievers and need a bigger one. That is not to say I jump all over him because he is a FA. If I had to choose between the two, that is who I would take. And in todays NFL 6ft 180 to 190 is not concidered big, average, not big. Big is 6-2 to 6-4 220. Owens,burress,walker,clayton,curry,muhammed ect. You can disagree like a mature person or an idiot, seems to me you always take the idiot route. Like I said, what fact or research do you want me to do? what facts am I to check. I was a year off with the age. thats something to freak out about! You are truely annoying with your comments when someone has a different point of view. I dont attack people, or say they are incoherent, that is just f***ing stupid. grow up act like a mature adult and let people have their opinions or statements. You make this a totally un enjoyable site with all your bull shit remarks and "I'll roundhouse kick your ass all over this site" please!