2006 Player Tracker

Pages : 1 [2] 3

FRPLG
03-08-2006, 11:44 PM
After reading this... Is anyone else tired of Patten?? The guy is a punk. He was the 3rd or 4th receiver on a dynasty, comes here and does nothing and bitches all the time.

I hope they cut him.
Guys NEVER give back money when they restructure. The restructure is usually simply moving money around to circumvent the cap and usually the players ends up with MORE gurnateed money. Just because he admits he wouldn't volunteer to give back money doesn't mean he is a punk. Would you give back money to your job willingly?

Sheriff Gonna Getcha
03-08-2006, 11:44 PM
The only thing is that restructuring benefits the player. They typically end up with more guaranteed money (which is really what matters with NFL contracts). All I have heard from Patten is that he was healthy when they cut him.... blah blah. The guy didn't do anything healthy so he may as well collect his check and support the team.

He was definately underwhelming. He didn't meet my expectations. But then again, mine were pretty high. Our passing game seemed better when he was around.

Pocket$ $traight
03-08-2006, 11:48 PM
Guys NEVER give back money when they restructure. The restructure is usually simply moving money around to circumvent the cap and usually the players ends up with MORE gurnateed money. Just because he admits he wouldn't volunteer to give back money doesn't mean he is a punk. Would you give back money to your job willingly?

I guess when the franchise is making a playoff run and they gave him a bigger contract than anyone else would, I expected something positive out of his mouth. His comment about giving back money was unnecessary and stupid and I want to see the guy do something, anything and then he can throw in his two cents.

FRPLG
03-08-2006, 11:49 PM
I guess when the franchise is making a playoff run and they gave him a bigger contract than anyone else would, I expected something positive out of his mouth. His comment about giving back money was unnecessary and stupid and I want to see the guy do something, anything and then he can throw in his two cents.
Fair enough. Can't argue with that.

drew54
03-09-2006, 12:09 AM
After Patten got hurt, Moss didn't put up near the consistent numbers he was earlier in the year. I think his speed helps keep the defense from double teaming Moss. He will still be a valuable part of our offense no matter who we bring in as our "#2."

I think another reliable receiver like Bruce will help draw attention away from Patten and allow him to surprise us next year.

bigm29
03-09-2006, 01:11 AM
when is the deadline to get under the cap by??

Sheriff Gonna Getcha
03-09-2006, 01:29 AM
when is the deadline to get under the cap by??

Last I heard, it was tonight (Thurs.) by 11:00 p.m. EST. Curiously though, I haven't heard anything about major cuts. So, I'm probably dead wrong.

PWNED
03-09-2006, 09:31 AM
i had heard that we should be around 10-11mil under the cap if we release who we are expected to release

bigm29
03-09-2006, 10:15 AM
as far as u guys saying we should bring in bruce and abraham, i think signing aging veterans who just want alot of money is the wrong way to go. Building through the draft is what u gotta do. Any Redskin fan over the last 5 years should know that by now.

PWNED
03-09-2006, 10:35 AM
like i said in another thread, i think that signing people who are on the verge and maybe taking a chance on someone who "was" injured. thats how we got griffin.

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum