SmootSmack
03-05-2006, 08:04 PM
This could all be moot considering the CBA situation, but thought I'd share this. Especially since it's the only place I've seen this and am actually a bit surprised by the interest, if true.
"That might be easier said than done. Archuleta should command fairly large money in a free agent market where big money will be a relative term depending on the collective bargaining agreement. Washington has showed plenty of interest in Archuleta already and there is some other teams hoping to make a play for him."
http://www.stlouisrams.com/article/53197/
44deisel44
03-05-2006, 08:14 PM
That would be GREAT!..Ask that guy if he can work out the details.
That Guy
03-05-2006, 08:25 PM
not without a roster dump truly unworthy of making for one player :/
we'll see what shape we're in tonight.
That Guy
03-05-2006, 08:27 PM
wee....
http://www.milkandcookies.com/images/feature/f/familyguypbjt.jpg (http://www.milkandcookies.com/links/38524/)
http://www.devilducky.com/media/38524/ (http://www.milkandcookies.com/links/38524/)
Sheriff Gonna Getcha
03-05-2006, 08:29 PM
I can't see it happening. Assuming, generously IMO, that we got $9 million from the restructured deals and can save another $10 million by cutting guys like Noble, Harris, Ramsey, Hall, Tupa, Thrash, etc. we still need another $3 million to get under the cap and have room to sign draft picks. I have no clue where we would get the other money. The 30% rule makes it even more likely that it would be impossible to sign a guy of Archuleta's caliber. Finally, teams like Green Bay and Arizona would likely outbid us.
But, who knows, I could be totally wrong. That's just my 2 cents.
That Guy
03-05-2006, 08:52 PM
I can't see it happening. Assuming, generously IMO, that we got $9 million from the restructured deals and can save another $10 million by cutting guys like Noble, Harris, Ramsey, Hall, Tupa, Thrash, etc. we still need another $3 million to get under the cap and have room to sign draft picks. I have no clue where we would get the other money. The 30% rule makes it even more likely that it would be impossible to sign a guy of Archuleta's caliber. Finally, teams like Green Bay and Arizona would likely outbid us.
But, who knows, I could be totally wrong. That's just my 2 cents.
we have a lot of money in filler... 69 people currently making 235-460k each. frost and brown combine is almost a million by themselves.
steveo395
03-05-2006, 08:55 PM
we have a lot of money in filler... 69 people currently making 235-460k each. frost and brown combine is almost a million by themselves.
they dont count towards the salary cap....only the top 52 money makers count
Sheriff Gonna Getcha
03-05-2006, 08:56 PM
we have a lot of money in filler... 69 people currently making 235-460k each. frost and brown combine is almost a million by themselves.
Yeah, I know. But based on our (both yours and mine) estimates of the salary cap situation over the past few days, I think we can both agree that it would be very tough to sign someone like Archuleta. I say that knowing that I don't know precisely how much the restructured contracts saved us.
In any event, I don't really care for Archuleta. The guys is a force in stopping the run but has been suspect in coverage. Given that Williams likes versatile players, I'm not sure why we'd go after Archuleta. But then again, maybe Williams IS interested in Archuleta and knows that his coverage skills are better than I am giving him credit for.
That Guy
03-05-2006, 08:59 PM
they dont count towards the salary cap....only the top 52 money makers count
if you ditch one, the next one starts to count. so if you have to do like the titans and have under 53 players on your roster, thats a lot of cuts. brown at 460k is definately in the top 52 though. most of the 310k guys are too.
STPainmaker
03-05-2006, 10:20 PM
Archuleta is extremely overated. The guy is a great athelete we saw him in the combine and all that but he is not good in coverage. I'm very skeptical about the skins going after him. I hope its not true.