Monksdown
03-03-2006, 02:02 PM
ah, the closeness and oldness of the two names allowed them to slip past my normally brilliant and analytical mind.
Why the Redskins (and everyone else) won't field 30-rookie teamsPages :
1
[2]
Monksdown 03-03-2006, 02:02 PM ah, the closeness and oldness of the two names allowed them to slip past my normally brilliant and analytical mind. Dantheskinsfan 03-03-2006, 03:07 PM Ok, his name was definately NOT RICHIE. Go Cowpies!!Exactly the Unions is handleing wrong becasue the ones that have more to lose aren't the star players but the rest of the players taht make the team. The beauty of the NFL is that this is the only true TEAM SPORT you can get by in basketball with an MJ, Kobe, Lebron and have a good if not great team, you can get by in hockey with a Gretzky, Lemiux, etc, you can get by in soccer with a Beckham, Robinihio,Maradona, pele, etc, you can get by in baseball with a Babe Ruth, Pete Rose, Mark McGwire or a Barry Bonds etc.. But You can't get by and win titles with only a Barry Sanders, Dan Marino, etc... this is a TEAM SPORT not stars sports, also you need 53 player per team that's more then double of any Major Sport. Peyton Can be Making 100 mill a year in a uncap year if he wants 2 but with out a good line Harrison, Wayne, James, June, Sanders, Freeney, Mathis, His another Richie Manning. D'BOYZ 03-03-2006, 09:03 PM yep sorry about that is Archie Manning my fault....... |
|
EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum