SmootSmack
03-01-2006, 03:52 PM
Well now, isn't this interesting (http://www.redskins.com/news/newsDetail.jsp?id=6270)
Brunell Reworks Deal (FKA "Brunell Reluctant to Renegotiate Deal")SmootSmack 03-01-2006, 03:52 PM Well now, isn't this interesting (http://www.redskins.com/news/newsDetail.jsp?id=6270) That Guy 03-01-2006, 03:55 PM Yup, about 40% of whom are rookies. 34/47 = 72.34% 1st year rookies ;) as opposed to the more elusive 2nd year rookie types. That Guy 03-01-2006, 03:56 PM Well now, isn't this interesting (http://www.redskins.com/news/newsDetail.jsp?id=6270) yay, that means we can keep samuels and maybe washington and only have 32 rookies on our 47 man team! Sheriff Gonna Getcha 03-01-2006, 04:00 PM 34/47 = 72.34% 1st year rookies ;) as opposed to the more elusive 2nd year rookie types. I guess I didn't realize we needed that many rookies to get under the cap. I thought the number was closer to 20. Sheriff Gonna Getcha 03-01-2006, 04:01 PM A lot of us owe Brunell (most notably myself, for starting this thread based on the WP article) a gigantic "thank you....I'm sorry." TheMalcolmConnection 03-01-2006, 04:03 PM SORRY MARK. Please reread my apology note I wrote last year. :( dmek25 03-01-2006, 04:03 PM offiss is going to apoligize? That Guy 03-01-2006, 04:07 PM I guess I didn't realize we needed that many rookies to get under the cap. I thought the number was closer to 20. articles have been stating that, but if we cut all 56 players that would save us money and replaced them with 1st year guys, we'd still be 1.4million over the cap (its that bad). That's why the who would you cut thread was a fool's errand. if there are more restructures or a new cba it won't be so horrible though. Sheriff Gonna Getcha 03-01-2006, 04:08 PM SORRY MARK. Please reread my apology note I wrote last year. :( Goes for me too. Sheriff Gonna Getcha 03-01-2006, 04:08 PM Anyone know how much space we saved? | |
EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum