Colts Keep Brock

Pages : 1 [2]

That Guy
02-25-2006, 01:38 PM
As far as salary cap the Colts have it worse than us.

we're 21mill over with no real way to get under if the cba dies. the colts are right at the cap. they'll lose two or three players cause they waited too long to make a decision on keeping them (while their play rocketed their value), but there's no way they're in a worse cap situation.

Sheriff Gonna Getcha
02-25-2006, 06:11 PM
As far as salary cap the Colts have it worse than us.

I'm not so sure about that? What makes you think their cap situation is worse than ours?

saden1
02-25-2006, 08:41 PM
My rational is that while we are in "cap hell" they are avoiding cap hell by releasing very good players. I'm sure if there is no CBA agreement we will have to release good players but I bet you we won't be releasing high profile players like Mathis, Tripplet and James. They are dumping players right now to stay under the cap, we haven't yet but I just can't see us letting Portis go.

That Guy
02-26-2006, 01:03 AM
My rational is that while we are in "cap hell" they are avoiding cap hell by releasing very good players. I'm sure if there is no CBA agreement we will have to release good players but I bet you we won't be releasing high profile players like Mathis, Tripplet and James. They are dumping players right now to stay under the cap, we haven't yet but I just can't see us letting Portis go.

portis costs 2mill more to release than to keep.

guys like washington and jansen could end up gone though... look at the latest "what if the cba dies" thread. 8$mill is left after projected cuts and our starters only save 500-800k a pop. I assure you that a dea cba will be a sky is falling situation here unless players are willing to give back serious money (and not just one or two guys).

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum