NFL Says SB Properly Officiated!

This is getting more attention than the famous Mark Brunell vs. Patrick Ramsey debate.

Maybe we can do a poll? Who outplayed who in the SB.I thought we should a Ramsey v/s brunell poll.

I thought we should a Ramsey v/s brunell poll.

:lol:

This is getting more attention than the famous Mark Brunell vs. Patrick Ramsey debate.

LOL I think we have a long way to go for that!

The Brunell/Ramsey debate isn't over yet either. Just wait until Ramsey is traded.

:doh:

Of coarse they do.denial is an ugly disease. not saying it had anything to do with ending but mistakes were made and to say that there wasn't is a lie.it wouldn't be soo bad if they would just admit it.

Taylor Jacobs is a pussy

Saying that they only made 3 plays doesn't really support your point. That's what EVERY team does to win a game. When the Skins blew out Dallas, they made 5 plays to win. Outplayed or not, Pittsburgh won the game. Dallas outplayed the Redskins the first time around, but the Skins came up with BIG PLAYS with it counted. Do you think Dallas deserved to win that game?



i'm not quite sure what your trying to get at.

maybe i didn't explain myself well enough. my point was that i thought seattle outplyed pitt. overall, it's my opinion, that seattle played better on offense and on defense. i'm not saying seattle deserves to win because they outplayed pitt, i'm just simply saying seattle outplayed pitt. defensivly pitt had trouble stopping seattle, the officialls did a much better job then pitt did. offensivly pitt didn't do a whole lot, outside of those three plays. were those 3 plays enough to win ? yes but not because they outplayed seattle. like i said, this is just my opinion.

i hope i did better at explaining my reasoning. if not, i'm sorry.

LOL what game were you guys watching exactly??

Seems like you two are the only ones in the country convinced Seattle outplayed Pittsburgh.


besides a few people on this site i have yet to talk to or hear someone on tv that thinks seattle did not outplay pitt. everyone i've talked to or seen says that basically seattle lost the game moreso than pitt won. they all point to the bad play of stevens and the "questionable" officiating.

maybe you have talked to or seen people that feel differently, thats great but i'm just giving you a little day in the life of wolfeskins.

You can't tell me converting on just five 3rd downs has very little to do with the outcome of the game. Those are stalled drives, lost opportunities, and most importantly lost scoring chances.

Steven's 4 drops, Hasselbeck's INT and 2 missed FG's were far more damaging in the overall outcome than the refs in my opinion.


thats great, i'm glad that thats your opinion. my opinion is just a bit different than yours. i respect your opinion, i just feel differently about it.

other than the holding call,and the chop block on the hasselback int,the game really was'nt called that biased,imho.i saw a few penalties the refs missed that
a blind man could have seen!!!