bertoskins
01-25-2006, 11:31 PM
Is to trade Lavar to the cardinals
and get 2 of their wr's (fitzgerald is untouchable)
I think they can absorb his salary cap
what dou you think guys? is this possible
saskin
01-25-2006, 11:37 PM
Maybe we could just send them jacobs and brown instead for their 2 recievers.....
But I don't think lavar will solve all of their defensive problems....
Beemnseven
01-25-2006, 11:39 PM
Not a chance. Dennis Green loves to throw the ball, and that's one of the very few things the Cardinals do well.
No way are they going to part with any of their receivers.
That Guy
01-25-2006, 11:50 PM
trading lavar gets you a 2nd roun pick maybe cause everyone thinks we're tossing him... maybe only a 3rd. boldin or fitz get you a 1st + extras.
No Way.
dmek25
01-25-2006, 11:52 PM
do not trade lavar!david patton will be back and with holdman a free agent,you just create another problem.we need a pass rusher first and foremost
SUNRA
01-25-2006, 11:53 PM
Detroit has more than enough receivers to trade but Charles Rodgers is a bust. Either Roy Williams or Mike Williams is a good deal. We should have had Mike Williams in the draft anyway.
railcon56
01-26-2006, 12:00 AM
LaVar will restructure and 1 year removed for his surgery will be back and hungry... Sorry to break ranks with my buddy Offiss on this one lol
Beemnseven
01-26-2006, 12:02 AM
Detroit has more than enough receivers to trade but Charles Rodgers is a bust. Either Roy Williams or Mike Williams is a good deal. We should have had Mike Williams in the draft anyway.
Don't you think Carlos Rogers was pretty much a need?
railcon56
01-26-2006, 12:05 AM
Don't you think Carlos Rogers was pretty much a need?
He's gonna have a great year in 2006
Dirtbag59
01-26-2006, 12:07 AM
trading lavar gets you a 2nd roun pick maybe cause everyone thinks we're tossing him... maybe only a 3rd. boldin or fitz get you a 1st + extras.
No Way.
Great point.
But why does everyone want to get rid of Lavar? It going to cost more to release him then keep him, plus he wants to be here