gibbsisgod
01-24-2006, 07:26 PM
Simple, one is a habitual screw up on the field, and the other is a constant playmaker, there is a difference, obviously Williams thinks so to because I didn't see him yank Washington.
Lets not get into this Arrington, Washington comparison, it's just to embarrising for Lavar.lavar couldn't hold marcus' jock. he gets less pub. and is ten times the lb
offiss
01-24-2006, 07:27 PM
lavar couldn't hold marcus' jock. he gets less pub. and is ten times the lb
HERE, HERE!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :towel:
jdlea
01-24-2006, 07:28 PM
Why'd you change your original post? It was a good question
I didn't feel like going there, you know what it said, you can post it.
J DIZZLE
01-24-2006, 07:35 PM
I also like the idea of just keeping Lavar.. I dont want to even think of him leaving.
gibbsisgod
01-24-2006, 07:40 PM
I, for one, am tired of Lavar. he is a whiny baby. anyone that believes past statistics merits future playing time is not a team player. he was whining about all of his jerseys in the stands and says the front office is jealous of that. that is horse shit. i hope he goes and goes fast. good ridance to bad rubish.... or something like that
wolfeskins
01-24-2006, 07:57 PM
i'd like for lavar to restucture his contract for the better of the team and i'd like to see him given another chance as a starter on the defense. he was a very good lb, in my opinion, and i think he can be again.
That Guy
01-25-2006, 09:06 AM
it'd be better to keep him because otherwise we'd have to take the hit AND sign someone else. clemons could start, but we'd need at least 1 backup that could also start (and who's name isn't warrick holdman).